Breaking: Hillary cleared of all wrong doing in email case!

Search

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
An FBI Investigation that CLEARED HER of any Criminal offenses, She did stupid, careless things. She did not commit prosecutable crimes. End of story. Or at least it should be, but the R"s can milk this shit for multiple political witch hunt hearings, that change nothing except play to their brain dead sheep.
Hillary was cleared, after her FBI Investigation.
quote-and-that-s-the-bottom-line-cuz-stone-cold-said-so-stone-cold-steve-austin-59-17-60.jpg

Quote from Comey "Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information' .... 'Although we did not find clear evidence that secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws,'...... ''This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,'

Cleared?? Hardly!!!! Only skaing because someone made him let her off the hook.... must be nice to be an untouchable Clinton!
 

Banned
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
12,115
Tokens
Quote from Comey "Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information' .... 'Although we did not find clear evidence that secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws,'...... ''This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,'

Cleared?? Hardly!!!! Only skaing because someone made him let her off the hook.... must be nice to be an untouchable Clinton!

You know perfectly well, as do 90% of those others who will read this that there will be a "Toll" that will get payed.

By Clintons, by any and all who are as they are...call it "Karma", "Universal Justice", some God metering out Justice..

whatever your own personal name for it is. Already Hillary has serious Health Challenges. She deals with these, conceals them admirably.

She is really quite Strong. In a less "bad" person her strength would be admirable. Her Health too bad to endure a 4-year term She knows this.

She wants the accomplishment. First Female President. Can't blame her.

"Justice" already knocks on her door though....these Health Challenges. Had she been a less "Slash & Burn" type individual, maybe she does not wind up with such health challenges...

...but then, if she is less ruthless, less 2-faced she doesn't get to where she is, on the threshold of becoming the first female Prez of USA.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
Once again, he was appointed by Poppy Bush, registered Republican, supported McCain and Romney. What's his motive for, not only doing the "wrong" thing, but immeasurably helping Democrats in the Presidential election? Anyone?

I've never questioned Comey's integrity.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
She should have known better is different than Gross Negligence for legal purposes. Comey said he had no knowledge of those e mails being in enemy hands, but they could be. Again, there's a difference. Comey's judgement, and no one in the nation was more qualified to give it, is that the errors, carelessness, etc., that Hillary was guilty of, did not raise to the level of Prosecutable crime. That should be the end of it, but today is the first of what will probably be addition Partisan Witch Hunt hearings, wasting time and money.

I'd hate to see your definition of gross negligence if this case doesn't meet your threshold.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Guesser, I consider myself libertarian leaning and must admit I do not know enough about Johnson. I did HEAR today he is not a true lib, so I am going to have to start doing some research
He's a sane, mainstream lib. Some of those guys at the lib convention were space cadets, thinking Driver's Licences should be illegal, and crap like that. Johnson and Weld is the most mainstream friendly ticket the libs have ever run, no Wayne Allyn Root type psychos on it. It coincides with a year when the major parties have the most unpopular candidates they've ever had as their candidates. I'm waiting for the books to post an O/U number on Johnson in November.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
I'd hate to see your definition of gross negligence if this case doesn't meet your threshold.
It doesn't meet Comey's threshold. He knows ALOT more than me, or you, or anyone here, what would meet the threshold.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Jan 15, 2010
Messages
28,332
Tokens
Guesser, I consider myself libertarian leaning and must admit I do not know enough about Johnson. I did HEAR today he is not a true lib, so I am going to have to start doing some research

He's very moderate for a libertarian, cause he believes in social safety nets, and on foreign policy he's not as hard core on non-intervention like say Ron Paul. He also only want to decriminalize drugs versus legalize them (except weed) The country is not ready for getting rid of everything, but they are ready for a moderate libertarian that will let business create jobs, and not worry about what people are doing in their bed rooms, with a more skeptical approach to foreign policy. Look up his record as Governor if you want an idea of what kind of president he would be. He lowered taxes, jobs were created, yet things like roads, healthcare, education, weren't lost. Bill Weld is another moderate, with a solid record.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Quote from Comey "Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information' .... 'Although we did not find clear evidence that secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws,'...... ''This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,'

Cleared?? Hardly!!!! Only skaing because someone made him let her off the hook.... must be nice to be an untouchable Clinton!

Ill put what he said into understandable terms for some of those here.....

"Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information" = We found out she did some shit, and possibly broke laws regarding classified information

'Although we did not find clear evidence that secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws,' = We know that shit she did broke laws, but we believe that she is just one of the dumbest people to ever hold a government position

'This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,' =

= Everyone else BUT Hillary would be nailed to a cross... stripped of any government clearance, and thrown to the wolves. But, we cant do that. Cause if we were to follow the rules, she wouldnt be eligible to be President... SO FUCK YOU AMERICA!!! Laws arent made for the elite!!!
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Quote from Comey "Although there is evidence of potential violations of the statutes regarding the handling of classified information' .... 'Although we did not find clear evidence that secretary Clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws,'...... ''This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,'

Cleared?? Hardly!!!! Only skaing because someone made him let her off the hook.... must be nice to be an untouchable Clinton!
Quite the charge, you are questioning the integrity of FBI Director Comey, because he's the one who made this decision. He chastised Clinton appropriately, for her errors of omission and commision, but none rose to the level of a Prosecutable crime. Cleared. Period, end of story. Except in these times, when Political Witch Hunts and wasting taxpayer money for such nonsense go on and on and on and on.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Quite the charge, you are questioning the integrity of FBI Director Comey, because he's the one who made this decision. He chastised Clinton appropriately, for her errors of omission and commision, but none rose to the level of a Prosecutable crime. Cleared. Period, end of story. Except in these times, when Political Witch Hunts and wasting taxpayer money for such nonsense go on and on and on and on.

So... how can Comey say ''This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,'

So... if someone else did something similar, it is prosecutable ..... yet just not for Hillary
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
So... how can Comey say ''This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,'

So... if someone else did something similar, it is prosecutable ..... yet just not for Hillary

He didn't say it would be prosecutable. That's you saying that. He chastised Hillary for her actions, quire appropriately. She was an idiot for doing what she did. It added to her deserved image of untrustworthiness. She's lucky she's running against a clueless clown like Drumpf, and not a serious candidate. It just did not raise to the level of Prosecutable crimes. The end. Except in our era of continuous Witch Hunts. Like the Benghazi tragedy, the R's will manage to turn this into a positive for Hillary among normal people, with their continuous, taxpayer wasting Witch hunt.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
He didn't say it would be prosecutable. That's you saying that. He chastised Hillary for her actions, quire appropriately. She was an idiot for doing what she did. It added to her deserved image of untrustworthiness. She's lucky she's running against a clueless clown like Drumpf, and not a serious candidate. It just did not raise to the level of Prosecutable crimes. The end. Except in our era of continuous Witch Hunts. Like the Benghazi tragedy, the R's will manage to turn this into a positive for Hillary among normal people, with their continuous, taxpayer wasting Witch hunt.

''This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,'
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
''This is not to suggest that in similar circumstances a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions,'
You can repeat it and repeat it, but no where in there does he say if someone else did a similar thing, they would be prosecuted for a crime.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
You can repeat it and repeat it, but no where in there does he say if someone else did a similar thing, they would be prosecuted for a crime.

"........To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"

So what would happen if Hillary lost her security clearance? Would she be eligible to be President.......?
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
"........To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions"

So what would happen if Hillary lost her security clearance? Would she be eligible to be President.......?
You are extrapolating the actual words he said, into what you want it to mean. He said what he said, he did what he did. Came to the conclusion that there was no Prosecutable Crime. The End.
The R's made it even worse for themselves today, in grilling him like he's some sort of criminal, and will make it even worse, with further taxpayer wasting, partisan hearings on the same thing, over and over like the Benghazi tragedy.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
So what are you questioning? Comey followed the law in making his recommendation of no charges, no prosecutable crimes.

I'm questioning how you can't just admit what she did was a crime. Whether or not they prosecute is different but she absolutely committed a crime without a doubt. It doesn't take a big man to admit it.
 

Member
Joined
May 27, 2007
Messages
39,464
Tokens
You can repeat it and repeat it, but no where in there does he say if someone else did a similar thing, they would be prosecuted for a crime.

But as we speak, a Marine Corps Maj. is being charged with the exact same crime. Mishandling classified information.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
But as we speak, a Marine Corps Maj. is being charged with the exact same crime. Mishandling classified information.

As long as he didnt do it on purpose, and plead ignorance, he should be A-ok... and then should get promoted
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,875
Messages
13,574,477
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com