Breaking: Hillary cleared of all wrong doing in email case!

Search

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,146
Tokens
I have to say one thing, with a few notable exceptions, when I look at the lefties on this site like the OP and several other regulars, it makes me more proud than ever to be on the opposite side of the aisle

They are the idiots of idiots, I'll leave it at that




Good and smart and reasonable lefties, I'm not talking about you. Just the fucking idiots, and everyone knows who I'm talking about
 

New member
Joined
Oct 29, 2010
Messages
40,880
Tokens
I have to say one thing, with a few notable exceptions, when I look at the lefties on this site like the OP and several other regulars, it makes me more proud than ever to be on the opposite side of the aisle

They are the idiots of idiots, I'll leave it at that




Good and smart and reasonable lefties, I'm not talking about you. Just the fucking idiots, and everyone knows who I'm talking about

You should never be proud of anything you say or do. You're a failure.
 

Active member
Handicapper
Joined
Jun 18, 2007
Messages
90,973
Tokens
The-Fix-Is-In.png
 

New member
Joined
Jan 16, 2013
Messages
2,625
Tokens
Hillary wasn't "CLEARED" of anything. They just chose not to charge her (because the FIX is in). There is a big difference.

Yep! Sad day for the rule of law in this country. If the evidence that impeached Nixon was presented to todays
group of "STATESMEN" & that evidence was against the likes of Ms. Clinton they would abdicate Ms. Clinton from
all wrong doing. What a joke this country is turning into & to think if Clinton becomes POTUS things will get even worse,
is sad indeed!
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,146
Tokens
Hillary committed 6 felonies and 110 misdemeanors (or was it 116 felonies?, hard to keep up sometimes)

The organization that found these crimes decided it's not in the best interest of the country to prosecute her

How do the fucking idiots interpret this? She's been exonerated

Lmfao

Fucking idiots
 

Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2005
Messages
2,751
Tokens
Hillary wasn't "CLEARED" of anything. They just chose not to charge her (because the FIX is in). There is a big difference.

They said there was no intent on her part. Cool. I am going to use that one if I ever get audited......like I am sorry but I never intended to not report that $200,000 in income, I was just careless.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
They said there was no intent on her part. Cool. I am going to use that one if I ever get audited......like I am sorry but I never intended to not report that $200,000 in income, I was just careless.

Is you last name Clinton, and your first name Bill or Hillary? Also you must be a political insider, and know which people to bribe at the right time....

Dont think it will work for a normal US Citizen
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
They actually did the *opposite* of CLEARING her, they stated that in no uncertain terms, she sent classified emails, THAT WERE MARKED CLASSIFIED when she sent them, from
her personal email server.

Now there are a couple donkey liberals in here that have been claiming for months that they weren't marked classified when she sent them - but they were lying.

Here is the proof, from today's press conference: https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/videos/10157263351880725/
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
They actually did the *opposite* of CLEARING her, they stated that in no uncertain terms, she sent classified emails, THAT WERE MARKED CLASSIFIED when she sent them, from
her personal email server.

Now there are a couple donkey liberals in here that have been claiming for months that they weren't marked classified when she sent them - but they were lying.

Here is the proof, from today's press conference: https://www.facebook.com/DonaldTrump/videos/10157263351880725/

110 emails, in 52 email chains were marked classified AT THE TIME they were sent.

If any other person did this, they'd be in jail right now.
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
110 emails, in 52 email chains were marked classified AT THE TIME they were sent.

If any other person did this, they'd be in jail right now.
Let's see. Should we trust a lying, partisan, Fake Religious, Islamaphobe racist, on whether crimes were committed by Hillary, or the non partisan FBI Director Comey? Tough choice, but sane, rational people will go with the latter.
 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
Let's see. Should we trust a lying, partisan, Fake Religious, Islamaphobe racist, on whether crimes were committed by Hillary, or the non partisan FBI Director Comey? Tough choice, but sane, rational people will go with the latter.

Actually it sure looks to me like it's Comey in the video that is detailing her crimes. The fact that he's too much of a pussy to indict her is another issue, but there is no doubt
that she committed felonies.

Did you even watch the video, or where you too busy thinking up a long list of childish slurs to sling at me?
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Actually it sure looks to me like it's Comey in the video that is detailing her crimes. The fact that he's too much of a pussy to indict her is another issue, but there is no doubt
that she committed felonies.


Did you even watch the video, or where you too busy thinking up a long list of childish slurs to sling at me?
If he thought there were Prosecutable Felonies, he would have charged her. There weren't, he didn't. End of story.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.
I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation—including people in government—but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.

 
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
45,000
Tokens
If he thought there were Prosecutable Felonies, he would have charged her. There weren't, he didn't. End of story.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.
I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation—including people in government—but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.


Or the other possibility, which most every sane person realizes, is that Hillary is above the law, and corrupt beyond all get-out.

I know this truth is a hard pill to swallow for fringe leftists.

Bill Clinton “accidentally” met with Attorney General Loretta Lynch in Phoenix, right? Wheeeeeee!!!!!

 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
Or the other possibility, which most every sane person realizes, is that Hillary is above the law, and corrupt beyond all get-out.

I know this truth is a hard pill to swallow for fringe leftists.

Bill Clinton “accidentally” met with Attorney General Loretta Lynch in Phoenix, right? Wheeeeeee!!!!!

Let's see. Fringe Far Right Message Board idiot, or Non Partisan, Respected FBI Director with an impeccable record. Which one to believe?
woman-weighing-options.jpg
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
If he thought there were Prosecutable Felonies, he would have charged her. There weren't, he didn't. End of story.

In looking back at our investigations into mishandling or removal of classified information, we cannot find a case that would support bringing criminal charges on these facts. All the cases prosecuted involved some combination of: clearly intentional and willful mishandling of classified information; or vast quantities of materials exposed in such a way as to support an inference of intentional misconduct; or indications of disloyalty to the United States; or efforts to obstruct justice. We do not see those things here.
To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. But that is not what we are deciding now.
As a result, although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case.
I know there will be intense public debate in the wake of this recommendation, as there was throughout this investigation. What I can assure the American people is that this investigation was done competently, honestly, and independently. No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear.
I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation—including people in government—but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation, because we did the investigation the right way. Only facts matter, and the FBI found them here in an entirely apolitical and professional way. I couldn’t be prouder to be part of this organization.


I love this part..... "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. (with the exception of Hillary Clinton)"

Except for Hillary Clinton........ He forgot to add that in after that quote....
 

Banned
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
15,948
Tokens
I love this part..... "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. (with the exception of Hillary Clinton)"

Except for Hillary Clinton........ He forgot to add that in after that quote....

Security or administrative sanctions. NOT Criminal charges. If Hillary was a Current Federal Employee, she might need to have an annual leave day taken away, as punishment. :):)
 

New member
Joined
Jan 29, 2009
Messages
3,172
Tokens
I love this part..... "To be clear, this is not to suggest that in similar circumstances, a person who engaged in this activity would face no consequences. To the contrary, those individuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions. (with the exception of Hillary Clinton)"

Except for Hillary Clinton........ He forgot to add that in after that quote....

All we need to know right there. That meeting with Lynch must have gone well. You know, when she and slick willie spoke about "grand kids and golf"

I think the difference between my self and these freaks on the left if a conservative was guilty of this, I would expect and want them to be punished. These ass holes are always willing to look the other way when its a dem. Denying extra security for our people in Africa? Fuck it, just blame it on a video. Using your personal e mail to solicit funds from foreign businesses, then erasing it and mocking those for even thinking about holding you accountable? Right wing conspiracy. Harassing conservative voters through the irs? Just a few rouge agents.

No matter what these pigs do to Americans, its ok.
 

New member
Joined
Aug 28, 2012
Messages
12,449
Tokens
Security or administrative sanctions. NOT Criminal charges. If Hillary was a Current Federal Employee, she might need to have an annual leave day taken away, as punishment. :):)

No... taking away of her SECURITY CLEARANCE, or TAKING HER FROM HER POSITION...... Either of which would bar her from holding the office of the President.

So, by the FBI not pursuing or "recommending" anything be done, they are letting her walk free. Even tho " otherindividuals are often subject to security or administrative sanctions."

Isnt it convienient... Bill meets "Accidentally" with Lynch for 30 minutes..... Lynch soon after says "She will abide by what the FBI recommends" .... and soon after the FBI says "although the Department of Justice makes final decisions on matters like this, we are expressing to Justice our view that no charges are appropriate in this case."

Kind of like what Momma said, on the show Momma's House... "Isnt that special"
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,869
Messages
13,574,427
Members
100,879
Latest member
am_sports
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com