Boston College +7.5 WoW......................

[Hemlock21]

<<Just looking at returning starters is a lazy way to handicap. Last year, BC had 3 GREAT players on D: Two DL, Raji and Brace and their stud LB Herzlich. Only the LB returns.

However, I guess you were really impressed with the way that BC shut down those two vaunted offensive juggernauts, Northeastern and Kent. Kent warmed up for the BC game by swamping Coastal Carolina with 18 points in the game.

When you add the factor that Clemson has two extra days to prepare, BC's young QBs will be playing in their first roadie, Clemson's young QB looked good on the road and that this is a revenge game -- well, this is close to the play of the week.

By the way, Hemlock, do not take this personally. In fact I almost love you and this could be the start of a bromance. Because I bet the game big yesterday at -7 and today the line went down to 6.s so I could bet more. I would have sent this email to you earlier today but I was too busy having orgasms after the line went down to 6.5. Best regards, RickRock<<

U are a degenerate gambler and I feel your pain. I handicap more than you know. This game is not a blowout and I'm sorry you feel that way. I'm just giving you the facts and if you think Parker look good against GT you should call this number 1-800-306-6789

 

[AlwaysKeen]

I like B.C. as well...just watched the tape of last week's game...WR Gunnel is very underrated as is RB Montell Harris...thought the Tuggle kid is good to at QB although they have been rotating...I see some issues with the O-Line but I think Spaziani is a better coach than Jags was, although not as good as Tom O'Brien...we are talking about a team in Clemson that was not prepared last Thursday and got down 21-0, coached by Yaba Dabo Doo, and you guys want to lay a TD in this one? I have learned over many year's this Clemson team is like a pretty girl who teases your cock and leaves you with blue balls, you get excited only to get extremely pissed...I'll take substance over sexiness anyday of the week, whether B.C. covers or not remains to be seen but remember that Spiller can't play all 22 positions and coach...GLTA...

 

[rollywood]

I have learned over many year's this Clemson team is like a pretty girl who teases your cock and leaves you with blue balls, you get excited only to get extremely pissed...I'll take substance over sexiness anyday of the week, whether B.C. covers or not remains to be seen but remember that Spiller can't play all 22 positions and coach...GLTA...[/quote]
Damn,man.I couldnt have put it better myself.lmfao

 

[Right-Side]

Damn Pags, LMFAO....one hell of an analogy. With that being said I tend to think clemson lives up to the hype and covers this number. I just hope they ain't no cock tease this year haha, RS

 

[BC-Eagles]

Pags is the only guy in this thread it seems who's done his homework. I was at both BC games this year, i'm at em all.

No doubt this is a different team from last year, the year before, etc etc.

Defense - solid
Pass blocking - solid
Run blocking - DOWN from last year
QB - Improvement on last year believe it or not, even with the Tuggle/Shinskie rotation
Secondary - Below average as far as big conference teams go
LBs - Down without Herzlich but tackling MUCH better than I expected

Feel like this is a good line with Clemson as the home team, wouldn't touch it myself as there are too many unknowns.

Oh, and bigtendominator, not sure why you need to run your mouth....Toal was injured last year--not really a loss from a starters standpoint.

 

[BC-Eagles]

These are more obvious from stats and what you're going to read but:

RBs - Montel Harris and Josh Haden are great backs (despite poor run blocking)
WRs - Very average for big conference teams, Gunnell is the captain and supposed to be the standout but he's been relatively quiet (apart from a couple nice catches over weak DBs)

 

[mws]

QB - Improvement on last year believe it or not, even with the Tuggle/Shinskie rotation

That's not that surprising, really. But what about the defensive tackles? Surely, you can't replace guys like Raji and Brace. And how does the TFr Kuechly look?

 

[bigtendominator]

Pags is the only guy in this thread it seems who's done his homework. I was at both BC games this year, i'm at em all.

No doubt this is a different team from last year, the year before, etc etc.

Defense - solid
Pass blocking - solid
Run blocking - DOWN from last year
QB - Improvement on last year believe it or not, even with the Tuggle/Shinskie rotation
Secondary - Below average as far as big conference teams go
LBs - Down without Herzlich but tackling MUCH better than I expected

Feel like this is a good line with Clemson as the home team, wouldn't touch it myself as there are too many unknowns.

Oh, and bigtendominator, not sure why you need to run your mouth....Toal was injured last year--not really a loss from a starters standpoint.

Go back and read the thread. Then tell me who was running their mouth?

 

[lachapellek]

what day is this game

 

[bigtendominator]

what day is this game

Saturday.

 

[lachapellek]

ohh nvermind im looking for a thursday game good luck if u bet it tho:cripwalk:

 

[AlwaysKeen]

good stuff gentlemen, I like these kind of threads...informative and funny...:cripwalk:

 

[gynecologist]

spread is down to -6 now.. Glad I waited, -7.5 was a little too high..

 

[AlwaysKeen]

so is Dabo when he coaches...