Ever since this "deal" was announced something has smelled foul about this. I have friends at Bear and JPM but as an American I was just offended by this deal on its face. It took a while for me to realize why my first glance was the right one. A lot of research later and I realized why my first impression was the correct one. As a marble among some really sharp tacks I will let a well known and respected person explain it better:
John Hussman of Hussman Funds says the following:
If you are concerned by what you read do some more research on the forums he has and some past Tickers and see what may lay in store for the Average Joe. Stop laying down for the pigmen and take some action to try and help yourself, or at least your kids/grandkids. They will be the ones who will be paying for our complacency!
John Hussman of Hussman Funds says the following:
One person has decided to take some action to try and stand up for the Average American. Karl Denninger runs a well read blog along with an active traders forum. He has done things like this in the past, but this time he has really taken lead. Read this Market Ticker and see if it meets your views and sensibilities. If so take some action!Bear Stearns is trading at $6 instead of $2 because unelected bureaucrats went beyond their legal mandates, delivered a windfall to a single private company at public expense, entered agreements that violate the the public trust, and created a situation where even if the bureaucratic malfeasance stands, the shareholders of Bear Stearns will either reject the deal or be deprived of their right to determine the fate of the company they own. Very simply, Bear Stearns is still in play. Still, when all is said and done, my own impression is that the ultimate value of the stock will not be $2, but exactly zero.
In effect, the Federal Reserve decided last week to overstep its legal boundaries – going beyond providing liquidity to the banking system and attempting to ensure the solvency of a non-bank entity. Specifically, the Fed agreed to provide a $30 billion “non-recourse loan” to J.P. Morgan, secured only by the worst tranche of Bear Stearns' mortgage debt. But the bank – J.P. Morgan – was in no financial trouble. Instead, it was effectively offered a subsidy by the Fed at public expense. Rick Santelli of CNBC is exactly right. If this is how the U.S. government is going to operate in a democratic, free-market society, “we might as well put a hammer and sickle on the flag.”
If you are concerned by what you read do some more research on the forums he has and some past Tickers and see what may lay in store for the Average Joe. Stop laying down for the pigmen and take some action to try and help yourself, or at least your kids/grandkids. They will be the ones who will be paying for our complacency!