Baseball forum is dead this time of year...so I'll ask here.

[JackPrice+]

Is it just me.........or do some of these over/under "total wins" for the 2010 MLB season look off?



EDIT - No offense, brother - But as noted further down in this here Thread, the lines/prices you posted were for the 2009 season.

Dumping the whole shebang downstairs....

--bar

 

[ChiTownHustler]

I had the Jays at 72, Cleveland at 78.
i will be on the under for both of those squads.

 

[Gravy]

if you can get Cleveland at under 83.5 do it

 

[viking611]

cardinals over for the max.

 

[JackPrice+]

if you can get Cleveland at under 83.5 do it

Already on it.

 

[GOFOR2]

Are you sure those aren't from 2009. I had under 74.5 wins for KC last year and over 70.5 wins for Balt. And they are the same this year???

 

[Quest4cash]

the 82.5 seems pretty low for the chi sox who got rated 3best starting staff in baseball by espn than add in playing in the AL central 85Ws should come easy.

 

[JackPrice+]

Are you sure those aren't from 2009. I had under 74.5 wins for KC last year and over 70.5 wins for Balt. And they are the same this year???

My site just posted them over the weekend and I'm aleady locked and loaded on four plays. If they made a mistake...........not sure what they'll do? Cancel my plays????

 

[JoeFalls]

just went into betphoenix to look at all of their baseball totals & they aren't up yet, at least from what i could see.

i also wanted to bet the padres to win the nl. betphoenix doesn't offer odds on the bottomfeeders (padres, pirates, nats, etc), and no offer on the 'field'. wtf, i want to wager on the padres to win the nl.

 

[JackPrice+]

Anybody think the Mariners at 79.5 is low???

 

[1106Madison]

Jack (or someone else)

Do you have access to, or know where to get access to, closing lines for last season's MLB? I'm trying to do some backtesting on an MLB theory but I can't find historical data. Any ideas?

 

[skrtelfan]

Greek has those lines up but without any sort of corresponding ML so you can't actually bet them. Maybe they're just testing their system because those certainly look like old lines.

 

[viking611]

Mets UNDER 89.5. BIGGGG

 

[Huckel]

there last years lines i already checked up im waiting to find a new ones

 

[Waz]

These are definitely last year's baseball lines, and I believe you got these from the Greek. They are still not bettable, but they should have refreshed lines up soon.

What does everyone like of the AL West this year? I think it's going to be the best division race in baseball this season as all 4 teams can make a good argument for winning the division.

 

[Huckel]

still think oakland under every other team in the division has better pitching and hitting so i dont see how they stack up

Texas hitting cant come close to how bad it was last year and they still were good

my plays depending but white sox and zona over may bet zona to win ws when im in vegas in a month

 

[barman]

cardinals over for the max.

Can ya feel the spring training chubby starting to perk up?

You coming down for any of March?

 

[barman]

JPrice's well-intentioned Topic has the Wheels come Flying Off upon realization that posted lines/prices were from 2009

thus the Thread Dump to RR

 

[Buster]

Is it just me.........or do some of these over/under "total wins" for the 2010 MLB season look off?



EDIT - No offense, brother - But as noted further down in this here Thread, the lines/prices you posted were for the 2009 season.

Dumping the whole shebang downstairs....

--bar

<a href="http://s163.photobucket.com/albums/t284/buster65photos/?action=view&current=newthread-cat-bite.gif" target="_blank"><img src="http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t284/buster65photos/newthread-cat-bite.gif" border="0" alt="Photobucket"></a>

 

[artiesliver]

Mets UNDER 89.5. BIGGGG

Agree, sent in the same today. May do some more.