It's a legitimate question, i don't disgaree there. Therefore, i already gave PARLE-G my answer. Last time i checked, your name isn't PARLE-G. I don't think you need to butt in and stick your nose in my asshole.
Obviously, we don't get along. So why continue to post in my threads? Have you thought of that dumb dumb? Sorry, but i think you're too stupid to remember things.
I’ve been tailing Varkeyboy’s tennis and doing well.
He posts a LOT of in game plays typically designed to get on a good player at bargain prices cause of a bad start.
When he posted Safarova I automatically knew it was ingame because the match had started.
So if you don’t know this history, please dial back all the suspicion about the motive behind a simple omission and let it go.
He posts a LOT of in game plays typically designed to get on a good player at bargain prices cause of a bad start.
When he posted Safarova I automatically knew it was ingame because the match had started.
So if you don’t know this history, please dial back all the suspicion about the motive behind a simple omission and let it go.
Exactly. Some tards here just don't know what is going on. Glad u were smart enough to realize that was a "LIVE IN PLAY" wager. Again, my apologies for not putting that in ( ). I just completely forgot as i placed the wager quickly.
No need to really explain myself, HAP. I'll keep doing what i'm doing.
this is the last time I will post in here. But what you said is irrelevant considering the guy said it was 44 minutes after the start. That’s pretty specific. The closing line before the match started was -140 safarova. Also, Marta was broke very early and was behind most of the first set. So how is it possible to get a live play in at -135 44 minutes after the start if the player was already up a break after 44 minutes??? She was -140 at close. How is -135 possible 44 minutes later up a break? Somebody is not telling the truth here. Has nothing to do with the fact that it was a live play or not.
If if it was posted 44 minutes after the start, there is no -135 available.... period. Meaning, what is the point in even posting other than just trying to convince us that you’re some great capper lol. I will stay out but you guys aren’t seeing clearly if you think this is just about stating whether it’s a live play or not. Goes way beyond that and I’ll leave it at that.
3* - Tsitsipas ML (-150)
3* - Raonic / Simon OVER 38 (-125)
2* - Simon (+345)
3* - Johnson ML (+155)
2* - Johnson / Thiem OVER 41 (+115)
3* - Murray ML (-155)
3* - Murray ML (-155)
1* - Murray -3 (-130)
That is not a mistake or a typo on Andy Murray. As we may or may not know, Andy Murray is coming off his injury. Verdasco is almost an auto fade for me all the time. Heavily invested into this matchup. I simply think it will be damn tough for Verdasco to pull off 3 out of 5 sets vs. one of the best players in the world!
3* - Raonic / Simon OVER 38 (-125)
2* - Simon (+345)
3* - Johnson ML (+155)
2* - Johnson / Thiem OVER 41 (+115)
3* - Murray ML (-155)
3* - Murray ML (-155)
1* - Murray -3 (-130)
That is not a mistake or a typo on Andy Murray. As we may or may not know, Andy Murray is coming off his injury. Verdasco is almost an auto fade for me all the time. Heavily invested into this matchup. I simply think it will be damn tough for Verdasco to pull off 3 out of 5 sets vs. one of the best players in the world!
