Looking at tonight's game you have a team in C Michigan that played to an offense that produced 25.8ppg the first half of the season and 34.7ppg the second half, so they got progressively better as the season went on, the problem was their defense got progressively worse from 27.8ppg allowed 1st half, to 33.7ppg allowed 2nd half. Your looking at a team that was producing 14 more points in their games from mid-season on. FAU 19.3ppg in the first half of the season (better comp), to 35ppg 2nd half, vs competition more in tuned to what they will face here, while the defense allowed 30ppg. neither team showed the ability to stop a good offense, and when you get to the 30ppg range your a good offense, and when your allowing 30ppg your a bad defense. The question is then, what have these teams done to patch up the holes? What has their opponent gleaned from the film to exploit? What effect will the FAU suspensions have on the offense? This one opened at 63, but has been bet up heavily to 69 last check, could push 70 by kickoff. That means a full TD and conversion of value to an under player, or chewed up value to an over player. It changes the points scored per minute from 1.05 at 63 to 1.17 at 70. You have to then look at yards per play for each team, and extract it from the "like" defenses they played on their schedules, and equate it to points, and the points per minute needed to cover. Time of possession in those "like" games divided by the points scored, will give you the point per minute figure to use as a basis of value, and show you where the true value lies. I just gave you a formula to do your bidding the rest is up to you, but that is my first approach and if it shows value on either side, then you must calcualte intangibles, to get a feel for the true value. Good luck.