Tommy, although I am impressed with your passion, I disagree with you wholeheartedly...
Please answer me why such an honest man as BUSH and in your own words, "EXEMPLARY" would LIE as much as what we see below?
<TABLE borderColor=#ffffff cellPadding=10 width="45%" align=left bgColor=#c5f9fc><TBODY><TR><TD>
[font=Verdana, Helvetica]Who Got Tax Cuts?[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, Times]
Bush: He talks about middle-class tax cuts. That's exactly where the tax cuts went.
Most of the tax cuts went to low- and middle-income Americans. And now the tax code is more fair.
Twenty percent of the upper-income people pay about 80 percent of the taxes in America today because of how we structured the tax cuts.[/font]
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
Bush said most of his tax cuts went to "low- and middle-income Americans" when independent calculations show most went to the richest 10 percent.
[font=Arial, Helvetica]Wrong on Tax Cuts[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica]Bush could hardly have been farther off base when he said most of his tax cuts "went to low- and middle-income Americans." That's just not true.[/font]
In fact, the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center recently calculated that most of the tax cuts -- 53% to be exact -- went to the highest -earning 10% of US individuals and families.Those most affluent Americans got an average tax cut of $7,661.
And as for the "low- and middle-income Americans" Bush mentioned -- the bottom 60% of individuals and families got only 13.7% of the tax cuts, according to the Tax Policy Center, a far cry from "most" of the cuts as claimed by Bush.
[font=Arial, Helvetica]The President came closer to the mark, but still got it wrong, when he said in the same breath that the top 20% of earners pay "about 80% of the taxes in America today." That's incorrect.[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica]In fact, as we
reported only that morning, the Congressional Budget Office calculates that the top 20% now pay 63.5% of the
total federal tax burden, which includes income taxes, payroll taxes and other federal levies. It's true that the top 20% pays nearly 81% of all federal
income taxes, but the president spoke more expansively of "taxes in America," not just income taxes.[/font]
<TABLE borderColor=#ffffff cellPadding=10 width="45%" align=left bgColor=#c5f9fc><TBODY><TR><TD bgColor=#fcd6c5>
[font=Verdana, Helvetica]Not That Concerned?[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, Times]
Kerry: Six months after he said Osama bin Laden must be caught dead or alive, this president was asked, "Where is Osama bin Laden?" He said, "I don't know. I don't really think about him very much. I'm not that concerned."[/font]
</TD></TR><TR><TD>[font=Times New Roman, Times]
Bush: Gosh,
I just don't think I ever said I'm not worried about Osama bin Laden. It's kind of one of those exaggerations.[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, Times]Of course we're worried about Osama bin Laden. We're on the hunt after Osama bin Laden. We're using every asset at our disposal to get Osama bin Laden.[/font]
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
[font=Arial, Helvetica]Wrong on Osama[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica]Bush stumbled when he denied making some remarks about Osama bin Laden that Kerry had accurately paraphrased. Bush accused Kerry of "one of those exaggerations."[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica]In fact, Bush said almost exactly what Kerry quoted him as saying. It was in a
news conference at the White House on March 13, 2002, after US forces had overturned the Taliban regime in Afghanistan:[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, Times]
Q (March 13, 2002): Mr. President, in your speeches now you rarely talk or mention Osama bin Laden. Why is that? . . .[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, Times]
Bush: So I don't know where he is. You know,
I just don't spend that much time on him , Kelly, to be honest with you.[/font] . . .
[font=Times New Roman, Times]
Q: But don't you believe that the threat that bin Laden posed won't truly be eliminated until he is found either dead or alive?[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, Times]
Bush: Well, as I say, we haven't heard much from him. And I wouldn't necessarily say he's at the center of any command structure. And, again, I don't know where he is. I --
I'll repeat what I said. I truly am not that concerned about him. I know he is on the run. I was concerned about him, when he had taken over a country. I was concerned about the fact that he was basically running Afghanistan and calling the shots for the Taliban.[/font]
<TABLE borderColor=#ffffff cellPadding=10 width="45%" align=left bgColor=#c5f9fc><TBODY><TR><TD>
[font=Verdana, Helvetica]Who Blocked Vaccine?[/font]
[font=Times New Roman, Times]
Bush: Bob, we relied upon a company out of England to provide about half of the flu vaccines for the United States (sic) citizen, and it turned out that the vaccine they were producing was contaminated. And so we took the right action and didn't allow contaminated medicine into our country.[/font]
</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>
[font=Arial, Helvetica]Wrong on Flu Vaccine[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica]It's not true, as Bush claimed, that "we took the right action" in blocking "contaminated" influenza vaccine from entering the US.[/font]
[font=Arial, Helvetica]Actually, it was the British and not the US that blocked shipment. The British Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency, according to an Oct. 6
news release, suspended the license of Chiron Corp., the manufacturer of approximately 50% of the U.S. supply.[/font]
In fact, the Bush administration seems to have been caught by surprise when Chiron Corp. notified the US Center for Disease Control Oct. 5 that the company wouldn't be shipping the vaccine due to the British action. The US Food and Drug Administration didn't begin an investigation until five days later, according to an FDA news release .
[font=Arial, Helvetica]It's also not clear how much of the vaccine is actually contaminated. The British agency said it suspended Chiron's license because of "concerns of
possible microbial contamination." And the FDA news release refers to "findings concerning the contamination of some lots."[/font]