LOL - no, in fact I posted the ABC news article in a similar topic at Covers when it was pointed out to me, that it might indeed be pesticides. I tried to post it yesterday here, however, I couldn't get in for hours and lost interest. This morning, at last review, there is STILL no confirmation either way, so I have not yet replied in that topic.
I'm not afraid of the truth, it will come out, but Grantt, you are, to the point of ignoring valid points that are against your viewpoints. It is a joke if you think you are being objective and blasting others for your perception of THEIR lack of credibility - you are one of the most biased posters I have ever, ever read. Lander and a lot of others at least have viewpoints they can defend - the best you can do is post false images like today's 'gas attack' supposedly by Bush without attributing it to the actual event - you are nothing but a propaganda-driven bullshit poster (I almost said 'artist' but you certainly don't qualify there).
If and when you EVER once admit one fact, such as the fact that Chemical Ali launched that 1988-89 chemical attack against the Kurds on the order of Saddam and it was ignorant of you to compare the limited use of tear gas (whose purpose is to prevent further injury to the person it's used on as well as a police office being threatened, as happened in those lovely, violent protests) to the purposeful use of the deadly chemical weapons in Iraq, IMHO only do I have no respect for your postings, just your right to post them.