I know what you wrote. I fully understand what you wrote. I was just commenting on the the political part. By the way I am the Motor City Mad Man not the MotorMouthMadman. Please show some respect.MotorMouthMadman read what I wrote, do not lecture me.
I took KC vs Miami and Buffalo for large $$$, today I do not like the game either side, I put a very small move for entertainment --- it is The Super Bowl so watching it without a significant wager is good unto itself.
Thanks for your info this yearWell according to pat everson who interviews top people at the major casinos thats whats being said in vegas -line moves public money versus vip players and all else -he talks with everyone walters and other sharps-ive won 6 strait SB going against the flow -i lnow nothing
Do you know how many SBs Vegas lost on? When Brady was in last few SBs, can’t tell me the team wasn’t the public bet….They don’t give a shit! Not like they haven’t raked it in during the season. And NFL platform is nothing in comparison to gaming in casinos. The NFL makes way more on the ratings and and commercials. Just last yr they made over $600 mil on commercials during the superbowl.Anyone care to elaborate or give opinions on the theory of one should avoid betting on KC purely because of the lopsided amount of public picks for them? Trying to Argue with a friend that this season this has held no bearing. Wonder if it is any different for the superbowl?
They lost on pats seattle pitt dallas way back when and a few others but overall money teasers props futures all togther 37 of 39 impressive , nowcaccording to ceasars kelce n mcafery bets together mean more then sf futures n spread combined!Do you know how many SBs Vegas lost on? When Brady was in last few SBs, can’t tell me the team wasn’t the public bet….They don’t give a shit! Not like they haven’t raked it in during the season. And NFL platform is nothing in comparison to gaming in casinos. The NFL makes way more on the ratings and and commercials. Just last yr they made over $600 mil on commercials during the superbowl.
You are confusing winning and winning on the spread. With all other available bets that doesn't mean they won on spread. My guess is they do though more often than not I supposeAgain vegas has won 37 of 39 and thats where i always like to be -However with all the new players and sharpies the lines have appeared to be off kelter and is getting harder to go against the Flow so to speak -most consensus have it kc and over but again its hard to say exactly come near gametime -tons of new betterrs and more states taking action - 90% of these new players are on the Swift props with kelce n company according to eversons interviews -mgm said despite sf big bets n futures they would sf to cover and under to hold down kc moneyline and kelce props -also tame down mccafery props -yet only 52% so far on over -ill update what i see if n when it comes
I did not say that -i said they won Overall on the SB games in total -teasers futures props etc but still won most spreads as wellYou are confusing winning and winning on the spread. With all other available bets that doesn't mean they won on spread. My guess is they do though more often than not I suppose
Here's a quick way to figure it.Everything I see is that much more is on KC, you keep saying this, though.
?????????
Take it easy snowflakeAlso I want Pfizer/Bud Light/Swift Kelce to lose, and Taylor Swift is a political tool for the Dem party, and the constant narraritve that Mahomes will be the GOAT soon is aggravating to me. Also aggravating is the 24/7/365 national narrative that Purdy is only good because of his surroungings. IMO if Balty had Purdy instead of Lamar, they beat KC two weeks ago. AND Mahomes had a lot of surroundings all those years w Hill and Kelce and some other speedy recievers, now Rice and others are finally coming along plus of course he has Kelce.
Also I want Pfizer/Bud Light/Swift Kelce to lose, and Taylor Swift is a political tool for the Dem party, and the constant narraritve that Mahomes will be the GOAT soon is aggravating to me.