Underdogs also killed it in 2013 - but you wouldn't know that. Take that message to 'Team Get Money'. Idiot.
pot kettle black
2013 was a record year for chalk.
http://www.sharpfootballanalysis.com/blog/?p=2410
Underdogs also killed it in 2013 - but you wouldn't know that. Take that message to 'Team Get Money'. Idiot.
I think I went about this the wrong way.. I know dallas is not as good as the 17 points they put up on SF.. and they will loss next week, is Tenn as legit at the 26 - 10 final score would say ?
I watched the Dallas Game, they literally only have 4 playmakers .. Dez Bryant got beat the fuck up in the 49ers game. 28-17 does not show how pathetic Dallas is.. even when Tony Romo had decent time he was clueless and his receivers did help out much either. DeMarco Murray impressed me , talk about some hard earned yard, and he didn't get them in clean up , they were legit, but that was vs. a shit 49ers D. Can someone give me a reason that Tenn does not beat Dallas by 20 ?
COMPLETELY AGREE (and this is coming from a Steelers fan)I got a different vibe after the SF game. Dallas has a bad D, but they played decent in the 2H. The early fumble and Romo throwing a pick in the end zone could have changed the landscape of the game. I think Dallas is going to be a tough bet this year because they can lay an egg or they could light the scoreboard up. The East is very weak this year and they should be able to pick up some wins within the conference this year. Good luck.
This is basically the prototypical angle that offers the best value in the NFL.. Complete overreaction in regards both teams involved based solely on opening week. Some nice value on Dallas.