Allowing Teams Players Choose Small Optional Sport Rules Will Increase Public Intelligence
Life is boring, if you want to increase the world population intelligence without the need of any risk, then I highly recommended allowing all sport players/teams to choose small optional sport rules.
In all sports, the whole world are blind following one set of rules in all match, all tournaments, which is super boring.
So why don’t just increase the interesting of the match, but also force players/teams to use their brain to think more about the potential strategy they could use to win the match.
– The rules for each tournament should not be fixed, but should add some small new rules to make the game more interesting.
Football Soccer
The most popular team sport at the moment, billions of people are watching and following everyday. If the rules will be more open, thus all the viewer/readers will use their brain to think more too.
In each match, either allow “weaker”/home/away team to choose/use or random draw any optional rules below:
– Number of players: 11 or 12.
– Match Time Duration: 90 Minutes or 80 or 70 or 60 Minutes
– Offside:
+ No offside rule.
+ Offside rule if the ball kicked from the home field, no offside rule when the ball kicked from the opponent field.
– Pennaty kick: yes or no.
If no then all the fouls will only allow free kick shot.
– VAR (video assistant record): Use or no use.
Tennis, Badminton
The individual sports should be similar to any material art fighting. There is no reason to keep long the match.
– Set: only 1 set (1 match) or 3 set or 5 set.
1 set only in the game mean there is no room for errors, there is room for upset, there is room for strategy, there is room for intelligence decide the outcome.
1 set only so the total games/point rule could be change:
+ In tennis: could use win when reach 10 games rule per set/match
+ In badminton: win when reach 40 or 50 points
* Change over when 1 player reach half win requirement or after every certain game/point.
– Supplyment: no supplyment foods/drinks consumer during the match beside plain water or must use only the same foods/drinks provided by the tournament.
* No health test: they are just waste of time, all players must control and take care/responsibility for their health.
* Doping rule: the default banned list are everything except list of allowed drug already verified/tested.
Above are just some quick example for popular sports, there are many other sports too.
There are 3 metrics:
– Level 1: players/team forced to play fixed set of rules.
– Level 2: player/team allowed to choose optional rules.
– Level 3: player/team allow to decide the rules of the game completely.
I think this current society must upgrade and use level 2 in the international games/match. While level 1 should only keep in either low level or student/kids matches.
Level 3 is a long way to go since it designed for godlike level.
Changing is always how life operating, whether you smart enough to adapt or not, it is another question.
Best Regard,
The Savior
Life is boring, if you want to increase the world population intelligence without the need of any risk, then I highly recommended allowing all sport players/teams to choose small optional sport rules.
In all sports, the whole world are blind following one set of rules in all match, all tournaments, which is super boring.
So why don’t just increase the interesting of the match, but also force players/teams to use their brain to think more about the potential strategy they could use to win the match.
– The rules for each tournament should not be fixed, but should add some small new rules to make the game more interesting.
Football Soccer
The most popular team sport at the moment, billions of people are watching and following everyday. If the rules will be more open, thus all the viewer/readers will use their brain to think more too.
In each match, either allow “weaker”/home/away team to choose/use or random draw any optional rules below:
– Number of players: 11 or 12.
– Match Time Duration: 90 Minutes or 80 or 70 or 60 Minutes
– Offside:
+ No offside rule.
+ Offside rule if the ball kicked from the home field, no offside rule when the ball kicked from the opponent field.
– Pennaty kick: yes or no.
If no then all the fouls will only allow free kick shot.
– VAR (video assistant record): Use or no use.
Tennis, Badminton
The individual sports should be similar to any material art fighting. There is no reason to keep long the match.
– Set: only 1 set (1 match) or 3 set or 5 set.
1 set only in the game mean there is no room for errors, there is room for upset, there is room for strategy, there is room for intelligence decide the outcome.
1 set only so the total games/point rule could be change:
+ In tennis: could use win when reach 10 games rule per set/match
+ In badminton: win when reach 40 or 50 points
* Change over when 1 player reach half win requirement or after every certain game/point.
– Supplyment: no supplyment foods/drinks consumer during the match beside plain water or must use only the same foods/drinks provided by the tournament.
* No health test: they are just waste of time, all players must control and take care/responsibility for their health.
* Doping rule: the default banned list are everything except list of allowed drug already verified/tested.
Above are just some quick example for popular sports, there are many other sports too.
There are 3 metrics:
– Level 1: players/team forced to play fixed set of rules.
– Level 2: player/team allowed to choose optional rules.
– Level 3: player/team allow to decide the rules of the game completely.
I think this current society must upgrade and use level 2 in the international games/match. While level 1 should only keep in either low level or student/kids matches.
Level 3 is a long way to go since it designed for godlike level.
Changing is always how life operating, whether you smart enough to adapt or not, it is another question.
Best Regard,
The Savior
