This playoff race is far from over.....The only team that is a guarantee is Clemson.....I cant see them losing to either Cuse,Wake or S.C.
Bama is no cinch to beat Miss St this weekend....The road is not easy in the SEC.
I`m still waiting for that 1 game....And that's Michigan St-Ohio St...I have a feeling Michigan St will beat them...I really do.
Baylor still has work to do with Oklahoma St and TCU yet to play.
The thing is if Iowa runs the table will they get in??
Bama is no cinch to beat Miss St this weekend....The road is not easy in the SEC.
I`m still waiting for that 1 game....And that's Michigan St-Ohio St...I have a feeling Michigan St will beat them...I really do.
Baylor still has work to do with Oklahoma St and TCU yet to play.
The thing is if Iowa runs the table will they get in??
Also,if Ohio St loses to Michigan St.
I think the winner from the Stanford-Notre Dame game will be a playoff team.
We`ll see how it shakes out
I think the winner from the Stanford-Notre Dame game will be a playoff team.
We`ll see how it shakes out
You never know for sure with these Big 12 teams, but I think you might have it the other way around. OSU still has work to do with Baylor and OU. The Big 12 championship goes through Stillwater this year, not Waco. Baylor's new QB doesn't have the ability to scramble or the playing experience in his trickbag that Seth Russell had. And that will be the difference down the stretch.
The next month will be fun to watch. Hard to argue Bama's not the top team right now, especially after they shut down Fournette.
Ohio State is as good as any team....and they have the co-best coach in CFB. Not sure why sdf thinks Urban will "outcoach" Saban. Those two have gone back and forth on "outcoaching" each other (2008: Urban, 2009: Saban, 2010: Saban.....2014: Urban).
Clemson looks really good....but being the best team in the ACC is like being the smartest retard in a class full of retards. They do have a solid roster, however.
Ohio State is as good as any team....and they have the co-best coach in CFB. Not sure why sdf thinks Urban will "outcoach" Saban. Those two have gone back and forth on "outcoaching" each other (2008: Urban, 2009: Saban, 2010: Saban.....2014: Urban).
Clemson looks really good....but being the best team in the ACC is like being the smartest retard in a class full of retards. They do have a solid roster, however.
I'll agree w/ you....but it's the "one-game" season type of thing (the Boise State's of the CFB world...where it's easy to get "up" for one game). Clemson has a good team...and they are very capable of beating anyone. But have they truly been tested? At the end of the day, those types of teams will lose more of the "one-game" season (the bowls/championships) then they win (see the SEC's 7 year streak: look at the losing teams and ask if they were truly tested along the way - they weren't).
Clemson Has Been Tested...or Atleast I Feel Like They Have!
They Beat A ONE LOSS ND Team(Only Loss To Clemson)
They Beat A TWO LOSS FSU Team(One of those to Clemson, Other Loss A Fluke)
And I Honestly Think CLEMSON Has The Athletes To Expose Both BAMA & OHIO STATE!
Good Thread Here
----ShotDoc----
They Beat A ONE LOSS ND Team(Only Loss To Clemson)
They Beat A TWO LOSS FSU Team(One of those to Clemson, Other Loss A Fluke)
And I Honestly Think CLEMSON Has The Athletes To Expose Both BAMA & OHIO STATE!
Good Thread Here
----ShotDoc----
Clemson fan here
we have some work to do on special teams, mainly kick off coverage and punt teams. special teams killed us against NCST, they had positive field 5 of their 7 scoring drives. I appreciate the in the thread.
i feel like we beat a very talented ND team, now I know it was only a 2 point win, but we didn't even try to pass on them in the second half. I feel like their secondary is their weakness, I feel if we played again we would win by more than 7(no rain please). I thought the rain helped them out, we played aggressive early and it helped. that being said, I think they are a top 4 team if they beat Stanford.
i personally would rather play, LSU, Bama, UF, Ohio St or ND than Stanford, Baylor or TCU. I feel like we match up a lot better against a down field running team. I look at Stanford as a more athletic BC team and we be hard to play discipline football. They will catch our Safties and LBs with their eyes in the backfield.
We could stop LSU and Bama in the running back and force them to beat Tank and Mac at corner. Baylor scares me because they will expose our 2 deep at LB. they will spread us out and force our LBs to have to cover a RB in the passing game in space.
it can be a bias opinion, I do think we are a top 4 team but we do have flaws, kickoff coverage, punt team and 2 deep at LB.
we have some work to do on special teams, mainly kick off coverage and punt teams. special teams killed us against NCST, they had positive field 5 of their 7 scoring drives. I appreciate the in the thread.
i feel like we beat a very talented ND team, now I know it was only a 2 point win, but we didn't even try to pass on them in the second half. I feel like their secondary is their weakness, I feel if we played again we would win by more than 7(no rain please). I thought the rain helped them out, we played aggressive early and it helped. that being said, I think they are a top 4 team if they beat Stanford.
i personally would rather play, LSU, Bama, UF, Ohio St or ND than Stanford, Baylor or TCU. I feel like we match up a lot better against a down field running team. I look at Stanford as a more athletic BC team and we be hard to play discipline football. They will catch our Safties and LBs with their eyes in the backfield.
We could stop LSU and Bama in the running back and force them to beat Tank and Mac at corner. Baylor scares me because they will expose our 2 deep at LB. they will spread us out and force our LBs to have to cover a RB in the passing game in space.
it can be a bias opinion, I do think we are a top 4 team but we do have flaws, kickoff coverage, punt team and 2 deep at LB.
