I made the point that there were several who were here just trolling this guy......and only showed up after the fact. The biggest dick move in gambling is bashing a guy after his pick loses, when that person made no pick. It could have ended there but the usual nitwits kept it going.
you weren't even involved until after I posted.....so common sense would tell you that it wasn't directed towards you. Surely you should be able to see that. At least I would think so but I shouldn't make assumptions here for sure.
Nobody trolled the OP, that is just Vittard lying and trolling, and trying to create drama. I posted a picture of the "oh really?" Owl, all in good fun. I didn't even post any text or comment, just the owl, and the site troll Vitterd comes in with his panties in a wad, and destroys the thread (as usual).
Vitterd is a cancer to this forum, as I said, I know of at least 3 quality posters (with a total of > 70,000 posts) who have explicitly left because
of this ass-clown's trolling. He said it multiple times yesterday, he doesn't give a shit what anyone thinks about his behavior, and he's not going
to stop, it's what he does, it's his life. I'm not going to post the poster's names publicly who have left, if a mod wants to PM me, I'll pass them on.
Yes, people should just ignore his shit if they don't like it, but when quality posters are leaving because of it, it is a serious detriment, and a long-term
negative effect on the forum that we all enjoy posting in.
Here is the E true Hollywood story on Festering Zit.
He trolls me almost everyday. I decided not to mention him at all until after he would troll me. He went 17 straight days of trolling. He stopped for a few days and I didn't mention him once. He lasted a few days but started it up again.
Now, zit had an agreement with another poster he was trolling, to not mention each other's name. Zit didn't last very long before he broke the agreement. He can't help himself. He's also made a truce with another poster to stop the mudslinging. He broke that as well. Is it a coincedence that's it's with other liberal posters?
now he's running around with this lie that posters have stopped posting because of me. This is Zits attempt to get me banned. He needs me banned because if I'm here, he can't stop trolling me.
Of course , his response will be "that's lies" but he knows it true. Its why he could not accept a lifetime ban bet with me if he mentions my name or I mention his. He doesn't have the self control to not troll.
End of story! Have fun in here!
vitterd out!
here is the e true hollywood story on festering zit.
He trolls me almost everyday. I decided not to mention him at all until after he would troll me. He went 17 straight days of trolling. He stopped for a few days and i didn't mention him once. He lasted a few days but started it up again.
Now, zit had an agreement with another poster he was trolling, to not mention each other's name. Zit didn't last very long before he broke the agreement. He can't help himself. He's also made a truce with another poster to stop the mudslinging. He broke that as well. Is it a coincedence that's it's with other liberal posters?
Now he's running around with this lie that posters have stopped posting because of me. This is zits attempt to get me banned. He needs me banned because if i'm here, he can't stop trolling me.
Of course , his response will be "that's lies" but he knows it true. Its why he could not accept a lifetime ban bet with me if he mentions my name or i mention his. He doesn't have the self control to not troll.
End of story! Have fun in here!
Vitterd out!
100% lies. The agreement was between AKPhiDelt and me. AKP broke the agreement. Fact. Here is even the PM that he sent me admitting he
broke the bet:
akphidelt
RX Local<dl class="userinfo_extra"><dt>Join Date</dt><dd>Oct 2007</dd><dt>Location</dt><dd>Anchorage</dd><dt>Posts</dt><dd>33,987
</dd></dl>
02-11-2015, 01:21 PMHey man, I know it was not established explicitly. I clicked on the RR thread about me and responded to CHOP about being able to lose a certain amount of weight.
Ace came in and mentioned that violates the agreement about posting in threads we create.
I honestly didn't think about past threads like that, that have previous conversations about us... and it didn't cross my mind. It had absolutely nothing to do with you or us. But since it was not established, I'm not sure what you want to do here?
It seems like a grey area, but I made the bet... so it's up to you. At no point was I trying or thinking to get you involved at all or talk about you.
I've told you multiple times, I don't give a shit what you post, but as long as you're going to post outright lies, I'm going to call you out on it.
You don't want me responding to your bullshit? Then stop lying. Simple.
The problem is that you're a pathological liar.
Haha fantastic!
She sounds just like a reporter lol
<iframe width="600" height="600" class=" pinged loaded in-view" src="https://vine.co/v/eOXWhmDwYPg/embed/simple" frameborder="0"></iframe><script src="https://platform.vine.co/static/scripts/embed.js"></script>
I'm done responding to him as well. You'll notice that once he stops trolling.....the thread will go back to what is was a few pages ago Hopefully he's true to his word for once.
GL shadow....hope the cavs make a run for ya. Played cavs in game 3 as well.
Everyone in here can see that you ruined the thread. You just HAVE to get the last word in though. Fucking pathetic.
If I told my real-life friends that there was a place on the internet where grown men spent hours and hours of their lives endlessly bickering back and forth with complete strangers about who was trolling whom, and about who was a bigger liar or a bigger moron...I don't think they'd even believe me.
I have no idea whats going on in this thread. I started to read but it seemed to turn into a personal attack thread.
I do agree with Vitterd's point about some coming in after two games and piling on. No one was offensive before the games were played but soon as GS wins a few games I see all the boo birds and the rude posts.
If you didn't want any backlash, why start a thread with such a hot (and wrong) take?
Plenty of people told you that your analysis was perhaps a bit off base before game 1 was even played.