A good read from USA today.(Thanks GW)

Search

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
Nuclear machinery found in Iran
USA Today ^ | February 19, 2004 | Barbara Slavin and John Diamond


Posted on 02/18/2004 11:03:41 PM PST by HAL9000



United Nations inspectors have found sophisticated uranium-enrichment machinery at an air force base outside Iran's capital, Tehran, U.S. and foreign sources with knowledge of the discovery say.

The find at Doshen-Tappen air base appears to undermine Iran's claim it is not pursuing a nuclear bomb. The discovery may strengthen calls for action by the International Atomic Energy Agency, the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog.


The IAEA would not comment Wednesday, nor would the Bush administration. However, a source with knowledge of the find at the base said the Iranians had constructed and tested a gas-centrifuge system there. Such a system is used to refine uranium for nuclear reactors or bombs. There was no indication any uranium had been inserted or enriched.


Iran has long been suspected of seeking nuclear bombs and is building a reactor with the help of Russia. The United States has questioned why Iran needs nuclear power, since it has the world's fifth-largest oil reserves.


Under pressure last year to disclose its intentions, Iran agreed in a deal with France, Germany and Britain to suspend efforts to enrich uranium and to let inspectors into the country to prove it is not trying to build bombs.


Last week, U.N. inspectors looking through Iranian nuclear documents found drawings of a so-called P-2 gas centrifuge, twice as productive as a model Iran has acknowledged using to enrich uranium. Iranian Foreign Minister Kamal Kharrazi on Tuesday admitted Iran is doing research on the P-2, but for peaceful purposes.


Two U.S. sources briefed on the IAEA discovery said the Iranians admitted that they also possessed the actual machinery and tested it. The discovery appears to indicate that Iran is moving ahead with a nuclear-bomb program.


Before the latest revelations, U.S. intelligence believed Iran was 10 years from a nuclear weapon.


"The question is, did the Iranians actually give us the Full Monty or are they just doing a striptease?" asks Patrick Clawson, deputy director of The Washington Institute for Near East Policy.


Three sources with knowledge of the latest find say it will be mentioned in an IAEA report to be sent to the 35 governments on the organization's board this weekend.


One expert said Iran should be encouraged to keep cooperating with the IAEA and not be subjected to U.N. penalties.


"You want the Iranians to reveal more, and we know there is more to reveal," says David Albright, president of the Institute for Science and International Security in Washington.


Pressure on Iran has increased since Libya decided last year to reveal its nuclear activities and Pakistan admitted that its top nuclear scientist sold nuclear know-how to Libya, Iran and North Korea.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
3,530
Tokens
I can understand people saying that Iraq is in worse shape now than it was before Saddam was ousted. At this exact second, maybe that is true. I don't believe that but if that's what you think, fine. However in 5 years Iraqi's will be living a 100 times better life than they were under Saddam.

Same is true forthe whole middle east. It think it is safe to say, had we not gone into Iraq, Libya would not have admitted it's weapons and Iran would not have allowed UN inspectors in there either.

No reasonable person can deny that the middle east is on a better plan for peace (in the long run) now, than they were when Saddam was in power.

KMAN
 

New member
Joined
Sep 20, 2000
Messages
15,635
Tokens
<BLOCKQUOTE class="ip-ubbcode-quote"><font size="-1">quote:</font><HR> No reasonable person can deny that the middle east is on a better plan for peace (in the long run) now, than they were when Saddam was in power.

KMAN <HR></BLOCKQUOTE>
I couldn't agree more K.
 

hangin' about
Joined
Aug 21, 2003
Messages
13,875
Tokens
Interesting thougts. While nothing, of course, could be better for peace than nations dismantling nuclear arms programs, don't forget to include underground terrorist cells who may see disarmament as abondonment by their respective leaders. I think the more that states bow to US and UN pressure, the more likely terrorist cells are to pop up, recruit, and arm themselves. While I obviously have no evidence to support this, I wouldn't be surprised to learn that terrorist groups have access to nuclear secrets. Certainly this would prove to be a greater threat to peace than if countries like Iran were engaging in nuclear weapons programs.

It's really a damned if you do, damned if you don't kind of scenario, for the most part. If the US and all other nations included in the nuclear non-proliferation treaty were to also disarm, we would be much closer to peace than ever. Of course, that isn't going to happen.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,186
Messages
13,565,151
Members
100,761
Latest member
jhavock123
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com