Bardude, if they prevent States from enacting their own legislation, the issues I raise come into play. Not because of wording within the Act, but because of the effect the Act will have on State laws.
I doubt this Act will be debated for the next eight years.
the word is lay man! not lamen!!!
HIP HIP..HOORAY!!
HIP HIP..HOORAY!!
HIP HIP..HOORAY!!
The Fucking Internet Gwaamma and Spullin POLICE ARE HERE!!!
I thought they only hung out at the ****** sites...guess I was wrong.
:Countdown
TRY SPELLING IT RIGHT YOURSELF YOU DONKEY@!! LMFAO!!!
Layman
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Layperson)
Jump to: navigation, search
This article is about non-experts. For non-clergy, see Laity.
Look up Layman in
Wiktionary, the free dictionary.The term "layman" originated from the use of the term laity, but over the centuries, changed definition to mean a person who is a non-expert in a given field of knowledge.
The concept of describing something in layman’s terms has come into wide use in the English speaking world. To put something in layman’s terms is to describe a complex or technical issue using words and terms that the average individual (someone without professional training in the subject area) can understand, so that they may comprehend the issue to some degree. An explicitly gender-neutral version of the word is layperson.
ointer:
uh oh looking like dems might get 60 after all
get your kool aid ready
stevens a POS so i really don't care about the guy himself just scared of dems being able to do anything they want
the problem we have in this country
is government does too much shit not too little
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/stevens
Stevens' loss was another slap for Republicans in a year that has seen the party lose control of the White House, as well as seats in the House and Senate. It also moves Democrats one step closer to the 60 votes needed to overcome filibusters in the Senate. Democrats now hold 58 seats, when two independents who align with Democrats are included, with undecided races in Minnesota and Georgia where two Republicans are trying to hang onto their seats.
get your kool aid ready
stevens a POS so i really don't care about the guy himself just scared of dems being able to do anything they want
the problem we have in this country
is government does too much shit not too little
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/stevens
Stevens' loss was another slap for Republicans in a year that has seen the party lose control of the White House, as well as seats in the House and Senate. It also moves Democrats one step closer to the 60 votes needed to overcome filibusters in the Senate. Democrats now hold 58 seats, when two independents who align with Democrats are included, with undecided races in Minnesota and Georgia where two Republicans are trying to hang onto their seats.
Minnesota is a done deal as well...Franken will win the recount.
Dems have no problem cheating...none whatsover. The magical votes found in election officials car trunks keep magically pouring in.
hno:
Remember when Bush had this kind of power in '04?! He didnt exactly do a whole lot, did he?Minnesota is a done deal as well...Franken will win the recount.
Dems have no problem cheating...none whatsover. The magical votes found in election officials car trunks keep magically pouring in.
Mistermj, you are in for a treat. I know that you are a guy who has a noggin for politcal history. Well, you are about to see some.
Never said it was A-OK.
It's just that you tend to play both sides and state the obvious over and over and over.
Stevens and Franken or Hastings or Barry or Rangel or Murtha
Well, at least one party votes them out, even at the risk of a filibuster proof Senate
