9/11 Hoax- More No Planes Eyewitnesses

Search
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
2,211
Tokens
LOL You are a kook and an idiot. TR is an idiot.

So when the french filmakers showed the plane hit the building that also was fake?

Or maybe when thousands of gallons of jet fuel is going all over the building nothing might blow up. Yeah theres no gas lines in that building or anything else that might blow up. LOL All you kooks are just that.

Why can't you just admit that there is evil in this world.


Im not admitting there is no evil in the world, there is evil everywhere. Way more evil in this world then any of us would want to even begin to imagine. All people in this country do is bitch about the government, all the government does is bitch about opposing parties, and in the mean time nothing gets done. For everyone who complains about how the Government does nothing but SCREW US OVER, why is everyone so quick to defend them on this? When they clearly have not released all the details, and have clearly LIED to us about how it all went down. Why is everyone so scared to ask questions? I think that if there is even THE SMALLEST CHANCE, im talking even 1 out of a 100 billion chance here that our own government did this to us, we should be getting to the bottom of it and exposing the possible truth. And with all the facts, coincedences and clips Ive seen in the past seven years, id say its way more then a 1 in a billion chance, more like 1 in 2, or 1 and 3 chance....Too many facts to not question this
 

New member
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
6,676
Tokens
REALY LIKE WHAT CLIPS ARE YOU talking about. I don't read anything TR post so those don't count. He's just a loser thats nuts.
 

Member
Handicapper
Joined
Mar 7, 2005
Messages
8,892
Tokens
The several hundred people that allegedly didn't die in the plane crashes (because no planes hit the Towers of course) were flown to some desert island where they were all executed and then both planes were dismantled to hide all evidence of the missing planes. Then, Bush gave the signal to send the missiles into the Towers.

This is pretty much the only possible scenario if you want to claim that planes never hit the towers because of the following facts; 1) No matter what you think hit the Towers on 911, hundreds of people are dead that boarded 2 planes that day, and 2) 2 big ass planes are no longer in existence.

Don't forget the thousands of professional air traffic controllers who were replaced by clones without their families knowing...because that is the only way you could have pulled it off. :think2:
 

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 5701773" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>TheRightSide</TD><TD class=alt2>LOL You are a kook and an idiot. TR is an idiot.

So when the french filmakers showed the plane hit the building that also was fake?

Or maybe when thousands of gallons of jet fuel is going all over the building nothing might blow up. Yeah theres no gas lines in that building or anything else that might blow up. LOL All you kooks are just that.

Why can't you just admit that there is evil in this world</TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


What plane? All the Naudet brothers caught - and theres annother guy a Chech guy too who caught the moment the bomb exploded inside the building or as the missle struck. All the films that show planes are found on close scrutiny to be the work of or closely linked to professional- not amateur filmakers.

Come on RS there should be hundreds of amateur films right? Where are they? They dont exist because there never was any plane on the films they were shooting.

BTW - any time you really want to score points in this thread instead of name calling (as if anyone cares what you think) you can tell me how they meticulously identified any of the jet parts they "found" .
All jet parts have uniquely identifying numbers hiddden deep inside each piece and even when severely damaged can be positively identifird as to what plane it is and who owns it.So get on the internet and find me this and you win. But you lose because-

9/11 was the only time in aviation history that a plane crash was not investigated in the way its been done for the last half century. By identifying the planes by these parts niumbers and letting the public see what happened so they know for sure their loved ones are dead because they positively identifired that plane.

Why wasnt that done? And dont give me any national security bullshit or youll make me laugh harder than when the NIST finally got around to telling us that WTC 7 came down due to "thermal expansion". :nohead:YA thermal expansion- more likely thermate expansion if you ask me...

Come on - wht cant you admit that there is evil in the world- and its wearing a suit and tie?:lol:
 
Joined
Oct 7, 2007
Messages
2,211
Tokens
I just think its an interesting topic to talk about, and im bored at work and pretty much have nothing better to do at the moment. Im not convinced yet, but I do think it is worth looking into. Once someone can explain to me what happened to the people and the big ass planes that are no longer in existence like someone else in here said lol, Ill be nothin more then a spectator. Until those 2 questions are answered, its nothing more then a conspiracy...I do see the incentive though, and WTC7 is still a little fishy

I am beginning to wonder though where the real evil is
 

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 5701839" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>TheRightSide</TD><TD class=alt2>REALY LIKE WHAT CLIPS ARE YOU talking about. I don't read anything TR post so those don't count. He's just a loser thats nuts. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


Your honor - my client pleads ignorance.

If you dont watch the videos get the fuck out of my thread you freakin retard. That 30 second attention span can be a bitch sometimes huh moron?

Waste my time and make yourself a certified asshole while your at it.

It was worth it...:nohead:
 

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 5701915" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>The Vegas Snake</TD><TD class=alt2>I just think its an interesting topic to talk about, and im bored at work and pretty much have nothing better to do at the moment. Im not convinced yet, but I do think it is worth looking into. Once someone can explain to me what happened to the people and the big ass planes that are no longer in existence like someone else in here said lol, Ill be nothin more then a spectator. Until those 2 questions are answered, its nothing more then a conspiracy...I do see the incentive though, and WTC7 is still a little fishy

I am beginning to wonder though where the real evil is </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>

The burden of explanation is on them not us. 4 planes- no bodies - no planes ever identified. All burned up into spatters of DNA and molten metal right? But somehow Mohammed Atta's passport is "discovered" just lying there on a pile of rubble containing micro sized pieces of bodies -furniture- computers etc. All objects no bigger than a phone pad!

But the paper and plastic passport of lead hijacker Mohammed Atta somehow survives the trip down- out of the flaming plane that burned everybody to an unrecognizable crisp - a plane burning with steel melting heat remember- and down to the ground.

Solved! Case Closed !!!


Next?:nohead:
 

Militant Birther
Joined
Nov 29, 2005
Messages
11,836
Tokens
No conspiracy has ever turned out to be true for the simple reason that a conspiracy is virtually logistically impossible to pull off.

People like TR who cling to conspiracies have a convenient vested interest in the outcome. In this case, TR's unlimited hate for the entire neoconservative movement.

Sorry TR, the burden is on YOU to prove your delusional fantasies beyond a reasonable doubt.

Case dismissed.
 

"Things do not happen. Things are made to happen."
Joined
Dec 6, 2004
Messages
2,624
Tokens
<TABLE class=tborder style="BORDER-TOP-WIDTH: 0px" cellSpacing=1 cellPadding=6 width="100%" align=center border=0><TBODY><TR title="Post 5701991" vAlign=top><TD class=alt1 align=middle width=125>Joe Contrarian</TD><TD class=alt2>No conspiracy has ever turned out to be true for the simple reason that a conspiracy is virtually logistically impossible to pull off.

People like TR who cling to conspiracies have a convenient vested interest in the outcome. In this case, TR's unlimited hate for the entire neoconservative movement.

Sorry TR, the burden is on YOU to prove your delusional fantasies beyond a reasonable doubt.

Case dismissed. </TD></TR></TBODY></TABLE>


None huh? Then it really was some bad Jews who burned down Hitlers World Trade Center?

It wasnt that the Jews were innocent? Hitler set fire to the Reichstag Building himself?

When the ultimate prize is power - no expedient is too impossible to implement.

Case dismissed. Your addiction to the hyperbole has sunk another one of your poor attempts to sabotage an idea Joe.


I suspect it wont be the last.


Surely youd agree that 9/11 was the perfect expedient for this War.


3000 martyrs signed alot of good young mens signature to join the in the hunt for Osama in Afganistan which ends up being stuck in Iraq kicking in doors looking for insurgents.


All of it based on lies. Think about that sometime. How do you NOT hate the NeoCons after that Joe?


Now tell me why you think they were doing us a favor by getting us into a ME war- pointing us in the right direction so to speak.


All of this ME stuff costs money joe. Imagine what they could do if they alloted the Trillions for Iraq to fix up this infrastructure of this country - the bridges in particular?:nohead:
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
Willie -Im suprised that as a bean counter you could screw up the 1040 again. Correct ratio - wrong subject. That ratio had to do with the hearing impaired.

It went like this-1637246 people who heard bombs going off to-
around 63 people with their hearing aids turned off...:nohead:

ah yes, people heard loud noises equates to bombs going off in some minds.

that good old implosion with explosions that don't sound anything like an implosion going off every 15 seconds over the course of 30 minutes implosion, brilliant :103631605

Did you know that not one seismograph that recorded the events of 9/11 recorded a single explosion, not one. Ah, those little details.

I thought you were a mini-nukes in the basement without radiation sort of guy, have you officially abandoned that theory? Do you no longer espouse to Loren's holograms with energy weapon theory either? Hard to keep up with the latest truther loser flavor of the day sometimes.

Please tell us your current theory in it's entirety so I know what to debunk.

If you can, let us know what happened to the passengers on those planes that didn't fly that day.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
The steel doesn't need to melt, it only needs to weaken. The impact of the jets probably disabled much of the sprinkler system, and the fires burned hot enough to weaken the steel, which begins at 300c and escalates quickly at 500c (approximately).

Anyhow, truthers argue that temperatures were not hot enough, but every post 9/11 research study I've seen says otherwise. This would not be a very difficult concept to disprove if truthers were even in the ball park. The whole argument about 9/11 would fall on it's face, and the world would publicize it.
 
Joined
Oct 30, 2006
Messages
40,113
Tokens
The steel doesn't need to melt, it only needs to weaken. The impact of the jets probably disabled much of the sprinkler system, and the fires burned hot enough to weaken the steel, which begins at 300c and escalates quickly at 500c (approximately).

Anyhow, truthers argue that temperatures were not hot enough, but every post 9/11 research study I've seen says otherwise. This would not be a very difficult concept to disprove if truthers were even in the ball park. The whole argument about 9/11 would fall on it's face, and the world would publicize it.
No scyscraper in the history of the World as ever collapsed by fire.... Those buildings were built to withstand much more than 911..Silverstein helped it along.. Do your homework.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,451
Tokens
In a "controlled burn" (where oxygen and fuel are regulated in an optimal mix), jet fuel will reach a maximum temperature of 1800 degrees Fahrenheit. this incident was not controlled, as far as the fire being continuously fueled.
 

Conservatives, Patriots & Huskies return to glory
Handicapper
Joined
Sep 9, 2005
Messages
87,149
Tokens
No scyscraper in the history of the World as ever collapsed by fire.... Those buildings were built to withstand much more than 911..Silverstein helped it along.. Do your homework.

How many 100+ story skyscrappers had planes fly into them again?

I've done my homework, do yours. Any theory you espouse will have 10,000 more wholes in it than the theory you disbelieve.
 

New member
Joined
Mar 29, 2007
Messages
1,451
Tokens
willie speak about how the fire weakened the steel. after we just posted the facts about jet fuel and the steel weakening point. and how your arguement falls on it's face.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,922
Messages
13,575,244
Members
100,883
Latest member
iniesta2025
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com