It seems stupid to put it in an area that already has somewhat of an economic base and densely populated. I know the surrounding towns aren't thrilled with the way the vote went down because they didn't get a chance to vote even though many of those residents were closer to the casino than Everett residents.
Seems like it would've been better to put it in an area without as much population similar to how CT did it. All in all I do think it is pretty cool that it is Wynn of all casinos and they released the design and it obviously looks state of the art. I'm sure it'll be a boon for that area.
You figure right off the bat they get a ton of that money that goes to CT, people from NH/ME and then a lot of wealthy Asian tourists right off Logan telling their limo take them to the Wynn. Wynn tends to attract that crowd.
I think all in all it will be a net positive but again, not sure why they didn't just put it somewhere with less of a population/base. I think it is one of those things that because of NIMBYs they took what they could get. Unless the traffic just sucks, I'd think it will hurt CT a lot. Can't comment on the horse racing and how it will effect that, don't really know much about horses but it seems like that was dying a slow death regardless.