game type = BG and D and tA(rushing yards/rushes) > oA(rushing yards/rushes) and season >= 2010
Game Type=BG: Bowl Game
D: Dog
tA(rushing yards/rushes): Avg yards per rush, defined by rushing yards divided by rushes, for the Dog
oA(rushing yards/rushes): Opponent avg yards per rush
>: Denotes that the teams's (Dog) avg per rush is greater than the opponent.
So putting it all together, we are checking for a Dog with the better avg yard per rush in a Bowl game.
Since 2010 they have covered at a 40% clip.
Game Type=BG: Bowl Game
D: Dog
tA(rushing yards/rushes): Avg yards per rush, defined by rushing yards divided by rushes, for the Dog
oA(rushing yards/rushes): Opponent avg yards per rush
>: Denotes that the teams's (Dog) avg per rush is greater than the opponent.
So putting it all together, we are checking for a Dog with the better avg yard per rush in a Bowl game.
| ATS: | 36-54-1 (-2.86, 40.0%) |
|---|
Since 2010 they have covered at a 40% clip.
Changing it favs of -1, PK, or Dogs.
Been good so far this year, but historically not good.
game type = BG and line >= -1 and tA(rushing yards/rushes) > oA(rushing yards/rushes) and season >= 2010
Showing 1 to 40 of 40 entries
Been good so far this year, but historically not good.
game type = BG and line >= -1 and tA(rushing yards/rushes) > oA(rushing yards/rushes) and season >= 2010
| SU: | 37-68-0 (-6.61, 35.2%) | Teaser Records | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATS: | 45-59-1 (-2.16, 43.3%) | avg line: 4.5 | +6: 64-40-1 (61.5%) | -6: 30-73-2 (29.1%) | +10: 68-37-0 (64.8%) | -10: 21-83-1 (20.2%) |
| O/U: | 48-54-3 (-0.74, 47.1%) | avg total: 57.7 | +6: 36-68-1 (34.6%) | -6: 67-37-1 (64.4%) | +10: 29-75-1 (27.9%) | -10: 74-31-0 (70.5%) |
| Rushes | Rush Yds | Passes | Comp | Pass Yds | TOs | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Team | 39.6 | 164.2 | 31.1 | 17.1 | 211.5 | 1.9 | 5.9 | 7.0 | 5.5 | 6.8 | 25.2 |
| Opp | 37.9 | 156.6 | 34.8 | 20.9 | 263.9 | 1.6 | 8.1 | 8.7 | 7.2 | 7.8 | 31.8 |
| Date | Link | Day | Week | Season | Team | Opp | Site | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | Final | Line | Total | SUm | ATSm | OUm | DPS | DPA | SUr | ATSr | OUr | ot |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 29, 2014 | box | Monday | 18 | 2014 | TXAM | WVA | neutral | 14-20 | 14-7 | 17-3 | 0-7 | 45-37 | 2.0 | 66.5 | 8 | 10 | 15.5 | 12.8 | 2.8 | W | W | O | 0 |
| Dec 31, 2014 | box | Wednesday | 19 | 2014 | BOIS | ARZ | neutral | 21-7 | 10-10 | 7-10 | 0-3 | 38-30 | 3.0 | 67.5 | 8 | 11 | 0.5 | 5.8 | -5.2 | W | W | O | 0 |
| Dec 31, 2014 | box | Wednesday | 19 | 2014 | GTCH | MSST | neutral | 14-0 | 7-20 | 21-0 | 7-14 | 49-34 | 7.0 | 60.0 | 15 | 22 | 23 | 22.5 | 0.5 | W | W | O | 0 |
| Jan 01, 2015 | box | Thursday | 19 | 2014 | MCST | BAY | neutral | 14-14 | 0-10 | 7-17 | 21-0 | 42-41 | 3.0 | 70.0 | 1 | 4 | 13 | 8.5 | 4.5 | W | W | O | 0 |
| Jan 01, 2015 | box | Thursday | 19 | 2014 | MIN | MIZ | neutral | 7-0 | 0-10 | 10-9 | 0-14 | 17-33 | 4.5 | 46.5 | -16 | -11.5 | 3.5 | -4.0 | 7.5 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Jan 01, 2015 | box | Thursday | 19 | 2014 | WIS | AUB | neutral | 7-7 | 0-7 | 14-3 | 10-14 | 34-31 | 6.0 | 65.0 | 3 | 9 | 0 | 4.5 | -4.5 | W | W | P | 1 |
| Jan 02, 2015 | box | Friday | 19 | 2014 | IOWA | TEN | neutral | 0-21 | 7-14 | 0-7 | 21-3 | 28-45 | 3.5 | 52.0 | -17 | -13.5 | 21 | 3.8 | 17.2 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Jan 02, 2015 | box | Friday | 19 | 2014 | UCLA | KAST | neutral | 17-0 | 14-6 | 3-15 | 6-14 | 40-35 | -1.0 | 60.5 | 5 | 4 | 14.5 | 9.2 | 5.2 | W | W | O | 0 |
| Dec 19, 2015 | box | Saturday | 16 | 2015 | AKST | LTCH | neutral | 3-10 | 14-7 | 3-17 | 8-13 | 28-47 | 1.5 | 67.5 | -19 | -17.5 | 7.5 | -5.0 | 12.5 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Dec 21, 2015 | box | Monday | 16 | 2015 | SFL | WKY | neutral | 7-0 | 7-10 | 7-28 | 14-7 | 35-45 | 3.0 | 67.5 | -10 | -7 | 12.5 | 2.8 | 9.8 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Dec 22, 2015 | box | Tuesday | 17 | 2015 | TOL | TEM | neutral | 0-3 | 12-0 | 0-6 | 20-8 | 32-17 | 2.0 | 49.5 | 15 | 17 | -0.5 | 8.2 | -8.8 | W | W | U | 0 |
| Dec 23, 2015 | box | Wednesday | 17 | 2015 | GSOU | BOWL | neutral | 9-13 | 14-14 | 21-0 | 14-0 | 58-27 | 4.5 | 64.5 | 31 | 35.5 | 20.5 | 28.0 | -7.5 | W | W | O | 0 |
| Dec 23, 2015 | box | Wednesday | 17 | 2015 | NIL | BOIS | neutral | 0-21 | 7-10 | 0-10 | 0-14 | 7-55 | 8.0 | 56.5 | -48 | -40 | 5.5 | -17.2 | 22.8 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Dec 26, 2015 | box | Saturday | 17 | 2015 | DUKE | IND | neutral | 10-0 | 7-17 | 10-14 | 14-10 | 44-41 | 3.0 | 71.0 | 3 | 6 | 14 | 10.0 | 4.0 | W | W | O | 1 |
| Dec 26, 2015 | box | Saturday | 17 | 2015 | TLS | VTCH | neutral | 21-24 | 10-21 | 6-7 | 15-3 | 52-55 | 13.5 | 62.5 | -3 | 10.5 | 44.5 | 27.5 | 17.0 | L | W | O | 0 |
| Dec 26, 2015 | box | Saturday | 17 | 2015 | SMIS | WAS | neutral | 7-14 | 10-7 | 7-10 | 7-13 | 31-44 | 8.0 | 54.0 | -13 | -5 | 21 | 8.0 | 13.0 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Dec 26, 2015 | box | Saturday | 17 | 2015 | MIAF | WAST | neutral | 7-7 | 0-13 | 0-0 | 7-0 | 14-20 | 2.0 | 62.0 | -6 | -4 | -28 | -16.0 | -12.0 | L | L | U | 0 |
| Dec 29, 2015 | box | Tuesday | 18 | 2015 | AIR | CAL | neutral | 7-14 | 14-21 | 8-17 | 7-3 | 36-55 | 6.5 | 70.5 | -19 | -12.5 | 20.5 | 4.0 | 16.5 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Dec 29, 2015 | box | Tuesday | 18 | 2015 | TXT | LSU | neutral | 6-14 | 7-7 | 7-21 | 7-14 | 27-56 | 7.0 | 74.0 | -29 | -22 | 9 | -6.5 | 15.5 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Dec 30, 2015 | box | Wednesday | 18 | 2015 | NCST | MSST | neutral | 0-14 | 14-17 | 7-6 | 7-14 | 28-51 | 6.0 | 61.5 | -23 | -17 | 17.5 | 0.2 | 17.2 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Dec 30, 2015 | box | Wednesday | 18 | 2015 | TXAM | LOU | neutral | 7-20 | 7-0 | 0-7 | 7-0 | 21-27 | 4.0 | 49.0 | -6 | -2 | -1 | -1.5 | 0.5 | L | L | U | 0 |
| Jan 01, 2016 | box | Friday | 18 | 2015 | NOTD | OHST | neutral | 0-14 | 14-14 | 7-7 | 7-9 | 28-44 | 5.0 | 57.5 | -16 | -11 | 14.5 | 1.8 | 12.8 | L | L | O | 0 |
| Dec 17, 2016 | box | Saturday | 16 | 2016 | AKST | CFL | neutral | 17-0 | 0-10 | 7-3 | 7-0 | 31-13 | 4.0 | 50.0 | 18 | 22 | -6 | 8.0 | -14.0 | W | W | U | 0 |
| Dec 17, 2016 | Saturday | 16 | 2016 | NCC | GRAM | neutral | 9-10 | 15.5 | 57.0 | -1 | 14.5 | -38 | -11.8 | -26.2 | L | W | U | 0 | |||||
| Dec 17, 2016 | box | Saturday | 16 | 2016 | SDST | HOU | neutral | 0-10 | 6-0 | 14-0 | 14-0 | 34-10 | 4.5 | 51.5 | 24 | 28.5 | -7.5 | 10.5 | -18.0 | W | W | U | 0 |
| Dec 17, 2016 | box | Saturday | 16 | 2016 | APP | TOL | neutral | 7-7 | 7-7 | 14-14 | 3-0 | 31-28 | -1.0 | 59.0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1.0 | -1.0 | W | W | P | 0 |
| Dec 23, 2016 | Friday | 17 | 2016 | NAVY | LTCH | neutral | 5.5 | 67.0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 26, 2016 | Monday | 17 | 2016 | MARY | BCOL | neutral | -1.0 | 43.5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 26, 2016 | Monday | 17 | 2016 | VAN | NCST | neutral | 4.0 | 44.0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 27, 2016 | Tuesday | 18 | 2016 | BAY | BOIS | neutral | 7.5 | 67.0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 27, 2016 | Tuesday | 18 | 2016 | MIN | WAST | neutral | 9.0 | 61.5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 28, 2016 | Wednesday | 18 | 2016 | WVA | MIAF | neutral | 3.0 | 56.0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 29, 2016 | Thursday | 18 | 2016 | OKST | COLO | neutral | 3.0 | 62.5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 29, 2016 | Thursday | 18 | 2016 | ARK | VTCH | neutral | 7.0 | 61.5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 30, 2016 | Friday | 18 | 2016 | TCU | GEO | neutral | 1.0 | 48.5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 30, 2016 | Friday | 18 | 2016 | FLST | MICH | neutral | 7.0 | 54.0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 31, 2016 | Saturday | 18 | 2016 | KTKY | GTCH | neutral | 3.5 | 61.5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Dec 31, 2016 | Saturday | 18 | 2016 | LOU | LSU | neutral | 3.5 | 60.0 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Jan 02, 2017 | Monday | 18 | 2016 | IOWA | FLA | neutral | 2.5 | 40.5 | 0 | ||||||||||||||
| Jan 02, 2017 | Monday | 18 | 2016 | WMCH | WIS | neutral | 7.5 | 54.0 | 0 |
"IF YOU WERE TO BLINDLY USE THIS "SYSTEM" & NOT USE ANY OTHER HANDICAPPING TOOLS, for the past several years, you would have "WITHOUT A SHADOW OF A DOUBT" won money, playing the "system" plays and "system" plays ONLY."
How on earth can you say this? Its been a losing proposition as a stand alone system.
How on earth can you say this? Its been a losing proposition as a stand alone system.
Yo G Shark you know you must be on to something when posters start muddling up the thread with a bunch of hard to decipher stats and plays to make it hard for people to follow the plays you post. Why must posters use different color font and post spreadsheets that don't paste well on this medium?? Likely coincidence or purposeful distraction?
Anyway Lets get this next play on WESTERN KENTUCKY HILLTOPPERS
Anyway Lets get this next play on WESTERN KENTUCKY HILLTOPPERS
The navy game doesnt qualify,,but if it did or if a qb was out in a future bowl game,,,then I would think the rushing stats im using indicate the better offensive and defensive line play,,,maybe if it was a running qb that helped rack up the stats and the back up qb doesnt run it might be a concern,,as far as a good running back being out,im thinking the blocking may have more to do with the running stats being so good and you can just plug in the next rb..looks like we will see this strategy come in to play with stanford,as they are a play
If there is similar systems that work then great,,,as mentioned by others,,,those systems should have their own thread as it opens up discussion on that system and deters from this one. Maybe a post in here that says "hey check out my system titled blah blah blah".. On a side note: Im glad we have some fact checkers here as I dont have time to check myself as I work 6 days a week w-thumbs!^
Absolutely love Old Dominion. They are going to stomp E.Michigan.
Rob,
I was posting information about a system someone alleged was a winning stand alone system. It wasn't. Would you rather follow a system that was touted as winning, but isn't? Or have someone take the time to check its validity, and post the appropriate data?
Rob,
I was posting information about a system someone alleged was a winning stand alone system. It wasn't. Would you rather follow a system that was touted as winning, but isn't? Or have someone take the time to check its validity, and post the appropriate data?
My apologies Biz. I have great respect and appreciation for all the work and research you have done on this thread and countless other threads I have read on The Rx. I was more frustrated with the lengthy epileptic seizure inducing color show of some other posts. Makes it difficult to find the posts from my good friend G Shark. Happy Holidays and Go Ol Dom!
Rob,
No problem. When I see someone post something without any data to back it up, I like to check it out and see if its valid.
I agree with you 100%. It was an absolute eyesore, and belonged in another thread. Hope I didn't sound too snarky wasn't my intention. I have no problem with your premise.
