2015 Custom Rankings System (Sustainable System or a Shot In The Dark?)....You Tell Me...

Search

Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
53,682
Tokens
Conn..........BOL with the system and your action this season.............indy
 

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
37
Tokens
Ok Guys...Here are week 2 formula Plays

Working on additional formula to help trim the games down. Will post it up when completed.

For those just reading the thread. YTD stats per qualifier are below.

ATS >7 <10 Plays: 15-4-0 - 79%

ATS >10 Plays: 8-6-1 - 57%

All System Plays: 23-10-1 70%


> 7
> 10
Missouri -21.5
Nevada +34
Maryland -7
UNLV +34
Wisconsin -34
Duke -3.5
Texas +6.5
Oregon -44.5
UTEP -3
Memphis -3.5

Ball State -5

Texas State -3

Charlotte +20.5

Arkansas -12

CSU +3

TCU -37.5

Wyoming +24.5

BYU +16.5
 
Joined
Oct 21, 2009
Messages
4,384
Tokens
just trying to understand when you say >7 but UTEP is -3?

>10 but CSU +3

Thanks for your help
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
453
Tokens
just trying to understand when you say >7 but UTEP is -3?

>10 but CSU +3

Thanks for your help

I could be wrong, but, I think the >7 and >10 are rankings. Kind of like some people have 10* plays and 7* plays. Hopefully he will explain.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
453
Tokens
Went back and looked at his spread sheet for week 1 and here is how the numbers work:

TeamsPower RankHome AdvLineAdj rankDifference
Ohio State Buckeyes56.056.0
Virginia Tech Hokies39.93.013.556.4-0.4
North Carolina Tar Heels30.530.5
South Carolina Gamecocks37.03.0-2.537.5-7.0WIN

So in the example South Carolina had an adjusted ranking of 7 points better than North Carolina, so South Carolina -2.5 was a play of >7 but <10.

In his system he is using anything above 7 as a system play. He is showing us the records of adjustments of 7 to 10 and 10 and over.

Conniseur hopefully will verify if this is correct.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
37
Tokens
Went back and looked at his spread sheet for week 1 and here is how the numbers work:

TeamsPower RankHome AdvLineAdj rankDifference
Ohio State Buckeyes56.056.0
Virginia Tech Hokies39.93.013.556.4-0.4
North Carolina Tar Heels30.530.5
South Carolina Gamecocks37.03.0-2.537.5-7.0WIN

So in the example South Carolina had an adjusted ranking of 7 points better than North Carolina, so South Carolina -2.5 was a play of >7 but <10.

In his system he is using anything above 7 as a system play. He is showing us the records of adjustments of 7 to 10 and 10 and over.

Conniseur hopefully will verify if this is correct.


Could not have done a better job clarifying. Thanks gk.
 

New member
Joined
Sep 2, 2013
Messages
37
Tokens
Ok Guys...Here are week 2 formula Plays

Working on additional formula to help trim the games down. Will post it up when completed.

For those just reading the thread. YTD stats per qualifier are below.

ATS >7 <10 Plays: 15-4-0 - 79%

ATS >10 Plays: 8-6-1 - 57%

All System Plays: 23-10-1 70%


> 7
> 10
Missouri -21.5
(loss)
Nevada +34
(WINNER)
Maryland -7
(WINNER)
UNLV +34
(WINNER)
Wisconsin -34
(loss)
Duke -3.5
(loss)
Texas +6.5
(WINNER)
Oregon -44.5
(loss)
UTEP -3
(push)
Memphis -3.5
(loss)

Ball State -5
(WINNER)

Texas State -3
(loss)

Charlotte +20.5
(loss)

Arkansas -12
(loss)

CSU +3
(push)

TCU -37.5
(loss)

Wyoming +24.5
(WINNER)

BYU +16.5
(WINNER)

> 7 (2-2-1)
> 10 (5-7-1)

ATS >7 <10 Plays: 17-6-0 - 74%

ATS >10 Plays: 13-13-2 - 50%

All System Plays: 30-19-1 61%
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,788
Messages
13,572,987
Members
100,865
Latest member
dinnnadna
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com