ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!Legal Experts Slam DA Bragg For ‘Weak Case’ Against Trump
Radical Left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against former President Donald Trump heated up again this week.
Bragg on Tuesday moved to oppose an attempt by Trump’s attorneys to move his hush-money case to federal court. Trump’s lawyers argued late last month that the case cannot be tried in a state court because the alleged violations took place while he was president, making them a federal matter.
In court documents filed Tuesday, prosecutors in Manhattan argued that the case should remain with the state court because the former president’s “alleged criminal conduct had no connection to his official duties and responsibilities as President, but instead arose from his unofficial actions relating to his private businesses and pre-election conduct.”
A Liberal Manhattan grand jury indicted Trump on 34 criminal charges of falsifying business records related to adult film star Stormy Daniels.
Says the 0-114 buttfucked abandoned thread always wrong nothing burger criminal fool. Yea. Ur opinion means something ?????ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
This is SO, Stevie-RAY-cist-like: 95% of your posts I just zoom on by, but THIS one, I couldn't resist, wanting to see WHO these "legal experts" are, and what do I find, not only did you "forget" to provide your "source" for the article, you "forgot" to name said "legal experts!" Where are they? I don't see them? I seem "Radical Left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s" name mentioned, and that "A Liberal Manhattan grand jury" ramed those THIRTY-FOUR CRIMINAL CHARGES up his fat ass, but, no names otherwise. The "author" reveals his stupidity with his little "slipped in labels," who CARES what the political leanings are of a Grand Jury when they have OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that a 50 years-grifiting scumbag has committed massive fraud. Well DONE, NAZI Scum.
YOU'RE A BRAINLESS, GUTLESS, MOTHERLESS COCKSUCKER WHO IS, ALONG WITH YOUR FUHRER, GONNA GET A BUTT FUCKING FOR THE AGES, IN NUMEROUS CASES, AND I'LL HERE TO RUB YOUR NOSE IN IT, AS I'VE ALREADY BEEN DOING WITH YOUR FAMOUS "DEM VOTER FRAUD HAS ALREADY STARTED" DEAL. SUCK ON A BIG, WHITE WHALE WANG, WHACK JOB.
The question to ask yourself in a case like this [is], ‘Would a case like this be brought against anybody else, whether he or she be president, former president or a regular citizen?’ The answer is… no,” Former Whitewater deputy counsel Sol Wisenberg said.Trump sent a payment to Daniels ahead of the 2016 election, allegedly to keep Daniels quiet about an affair the two of them had in 2006. Trump pleaded not guilty to all 34 charges.
Since the indictment, several legal experts have argued they believe that Bragg’s case is exceptionally weak.
Ahhhhh, FINALLY a name! It's roaringly OBVIOUS while you weren't exactly EAGER to name THIS putz; looks like he's almost as BAD at predicting as YOU are (a lawyer who appears on FAUX Noise to even INDIRECTLY defend Daughter Diddler, is, by definition, a putz with earflaps, NAZI Scum). And, this was ALSO you hiding your source, FAUX Noise. What, did you FORGET that they got BUTT fucked to the tune of 787.5 million, and are on the hook for even MORE from Smartatic and their OWN SHAREHOLDERS???? Oh, yeah, and, let us not forget that they obviously were compelled, or felt a STRONG need, to fire Fucker Carlson, lol. I'm not even sure whether you've now abandoned" FAUX now or not, you're such a flip flopping CUNT, I can't keep track.The question to ask yourself in a case like this [is], ‘Would a case like this be brought against anybody else, whether he or she be president, former president or a regular citizen?’ The answer is… no,” Former Whitewater deputy counsel Sol Wisenberg said.
Lol. Names all thru it u senile buttfucked 0-114 abandoned thread rock bottom bitch. Keep slinging ur fake news my shine bitch ???Ahhhhh, FINALLY a name! It's roaringly OBVIOUS while you weren't exactly EAGER to name THIS putz; looks like he's almost as BAD at predicting as YOU are (a lawyer who appears on FAUX Noise to even INDIRECTLY defend Daughter Diddler, is, by definition, a putz with earflaps, NAZI Scum). And, this was ALSO you hiding your source, FAUX Noise. What, did you FORGET that they got BUTT fucked to the tune of 787.5 million, and are on the hook for even MORE from Smartatic and their OWN SHAREHOLDERS???? Oh, yeah, and, let us not forget that they obviously were compelled, or felt a STRONG need, to fire Fucker Carlson, lol. I'm not even sure whether you've now abandoned" FAUX now or not, you're such a flip flopping CUNT, I can't keep track.
Former Whitewater lawyer explains why a Trump arrest would be 'preposterous'
Here you've obviously LIED again, like the Nazi CUNT that you are. She doesn't say a single, solitary word about the case being "weak," she says that Bragg's "...decision...might backfire," and that "This could actually be a problem for Bragg." How the FUCK does THAT carefully worded statement that Bragg rammed SEVENTEEN "GUILTY AS CHARGED" PLEAS OUTTA SEVENTEEN TRIES up the ass of the Dump organization, and how HE knows more about the case than SHE does, since she is a FORMER federal and state prosecutor, I will respectfully BRAGG'S opinion over hers. Try AGAIN, Birdbrain.Former federal and New York State prosecutor Tali Farhadian Weinstein said: “Bragg is making a strategic decision to push back against Donald Trump and it might backfire. The former president is demanding that the Manhattan District Attorney’s office provide a ‘bill of particulars,’ outlining the specific reason they upgraded his charges of business record fraud from misdemeanors to felonies in the Stormy Daniels hush payment case — something that under New York law, requires the fraud to have been committed in order to cover up a second crime. Bragg has declined to provide it so far. This could actually be a problem for Bragg.”
??????????????? Stay ignorant my ???Here you've obviously LIED again, like the Nazi CUNT that you are. She doesn't say a single, solitary word about the case being "weak," she says that Bragg's "...decision...might backfire," and that "This could actually be a problem for Bragg." How the FUCK does THAT carefully worded statement that Bragg rammed SEVENTEEN "GUILTY AS CHARGED" PLEAS OUTTA SEVENTEEN TRIES up the ass of the Dump organization, and how HE knows more about the case than SHE does, since she is a FORMER federal and state prosecutor, I will respectfully BRAGG'S opinion over hers. Try AGAIN, Birdbrain.
Wow, you're in RARE form re: stupidity today, even for YOU, which is saying something:Famed attorney Alan Dershowitz believes that Bragg could be disbarred for his case against former President Donald Trump.
Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox, wrote: “There is something painfully anticlimactic about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s indictment of former President Trump. It concerns not Trump’s efforts to overthrow the duly elected government of the United States, but his alleged effort to cover up a possible extramarital affair with a porn star. And there’s a very real risk that this indictment will end in an even bigger anticlimax. It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him.”
Mark Stern, a writer for the liberal outlet Slate, published a story titled, “The Trump Indictment Is Not the Slam-Dunk Case Democrats Wanted.”
John Bolton — who served as a national security adviser in the Trump administration and has since come out against Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign — appeared on CNN and blasted the charges filed against his ex-boss, former President Trump, saying the indictment was “even weaker than I feared it would be.”
I duuno who Ian Millhiser is, and he's certainly entitled to his opinion, but, one, an "anti-climax" is HIS opinion, and, two an anti-climax is NOT the same as weak case. Furthermore, he concludes with "It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him.” I'm sure it IS "unclear" to HIM, but, ya know who it's NOT unclear to: Harvard educated, duly elected Manhattan DA 17-outta-17 guilty charges already obtained against tRump.org, Alvin Bragg. And, sometimes, you have to point out the obvious: HE is an attorney, and Ian Millhiser is NOT. That also brings up the point hat THESE are your "legal experts," only ONE of the four people mentioned here is-for the moment-an attorney, Dersha-worst, and we've already DEALT with that hack. So, you lied FOUR TIMES in ONE post, stay ignornant, my NAZI Nut Nuzzler.Famed attorney Alan Dershowitz believes that Bragg could be disbarred for his case against former President Donald Trump.
Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox, wrote: “There is something painfully anticlimactic about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s indictment of former President Trump. It concerns not Trump’s efforts to overthrow the duly elected government of the United States, but his alleged effort to cover up a possible extramarital affair with a porn star. And there’s a very real risk that this indictment will end in an even bigger anticlimax. It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him.”
Mark Stern, a writer for the liberal outlet Slate, published a story titled, “The Trump Indictment Is Not the Slam-Dunk Case Democrats Wanted.”
John Bolton — who served as a national security adviser in the Trump administration and has since come out against Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign — appeared on CNN and blasted the charges filed against his ex-boss, former President Trump, saying the indictment was “even weaker than I feared it would be.”