“It has to be dismissed!” Pres Trump gets fantastic news as Low Life Liberal Bragg is told case is weak. A nothing ? from day one

Search

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens

Legal Experts Slam DA Bragg For ‘Weak Case’ Against Trump



Radical Left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against former President Donald Trump heated up again this week.

Bragg on Tuesday moved to oppose an attempt by Trump’s attorneys to move his hush-money case to federal court. Trump’s lawyers argued late last month that the case cannot be tried in a state court because the alleged violations took place while he was president, making them a federal matter.


In court documents filed Tuesday, prosecutors in Manhattan argued that the case should remain with the state court because the former president’s “alleged criminal conduct had no connection to his official duties and responsibilities as President, but instead arose from his unofficial actions relating to his private businesses and pre-election conduct.”

A Liberal Manhattan grand jury indicted Trump on 34 criminal charges of falsifying business records related to adult film star Stormy Daniels.
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Trump sent a payment to Daniels ahead of the 2016 election, allegedly to keep Daniels quiet about an affair the two of them had in 2006. Trump pleaded not guilty to all 34 charges.
Since the indictment, several legal experts have argued they believe that Bragg’s case is exceptionally weak.
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens

Legal Experts Slam DA Bragg For ‘Weak Case’ Against Trump



Radical Left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s case against former President Donald Trump heated up again this week.

Bragg on Tuesday moved to oppose an attempt by Trump’s attorneys to move his hush-money case to federal court. Trump’s lawyers argued late last month that the case cannot be tried in a state court because the alleged violations took place while he was president, making them a federal matter.


In court documents filed Tuesday, prosecutors in Manhattan argued that the case should remain with the state court because the former president’s “alleged criminal conduct had no connection to his official duties and responsibilities as President, but instead arose from his unofficial actions relating to his private businesses and pre-election conduct.”

A Liberal Manhattan grand jury indicted Trump on 34 criminal charges of falsifying business records related to adult film star Stormy Daniels.
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is SO, Stevie-RAY-cist-like: 95% of your posts I just zoom on by, but THIS one, I couldn't resist, wanting to see WHO these "legal experts" are, and what do I find, not only did you "forget" to provide your "source" for the article, you "forgot" to name said "legal experts!" Where are they? I don't see them? I seem "Radical Left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s" name mentioned, and that "A Liberal Manhattan grand jury" ramed those THIRTY-FOUR CRIMINAL CHARGES up his fat ass, but, no names otherwise. The "author" reveals his stupidity with his little "slipped in labels," who CARES what the political leanings are of a Grand Jury when they have OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that a 50 years-grifiting scumbag has committed massive fraud. Well DONE, NAZI Scum.

YOU'RE A BRAINLESS, GUTLESS, MOTHERLESS COCKSUCKER WHO IS, ALONG WITH YOUR FUHRER, GONNA GET A BUTT FUCKING FOR THE AGES, IN NUMEROUS CASES, AND I'LL HERE TO RUB YOUR NOSE IN IT, AS I'VE ALREADY BEEN DOING WITH YOUR FAMOUS "DEM VOTER FRAUD HAS ALREADY STARTED" DEAL. SUCK ON A BIG, WHITE WHALE WANG, WHACK JOB. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:lock::lock::lock::dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:an_clap::an_clap::an_clap::103625367:103625367:103625367
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
ROTFLMAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

This is SO, Stevie-RAY-cist-like: 95% of your posts I just zoom on by, but THIS one, I couldn't resist, wanting to see WHO these "legal experts" are, and what do I find, not only did you "forget" to provide your "source" for the article, you "forgot" to name said "legal experts!" Where are they? I don't see them? I seem "Radical Left Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s" name mentioned, and that "A Liberal Manhattan grand jury" ramed those THIRTY-FOUR CRIMINAL CHARGES up his fat ass, but, no names otherwise. The "author" reveals his stupidity with his little "slipped in labels," who CARES what the political leanings are of a Grand Jury when they have OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE that a 50 years-grifiting scumbag has committed massive fraud. Well DONE, NAZI Scum.

YOU'RE A BRAINLESS, GUTLESS, MOTHERLESS COCKSUCKER WHO IS, ALONG WITH YOUR FUHRER, GONNA GET A BUTT FUCKING FOR THE AGES, IN NUMEROUS CASES, AND I'LL HERE TO RUB YOUR NOSE IN IT, AS I'VE ALREADY BEEN DOING WITH YOUR FAMOUS "DEM VOTER FRAUD HAS ALREADY STARTED" DEAL. SUCK ON A BIG, WHITE WHALE WANG, WHACK JOB. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:lock::lock::lock::dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:an_clap::an_clap::an_clap::103625367:103625367:103625367
Says the 0-114 buttfucked abandoned thread always wrong nothing burger criminal fool. Yea. Ur opinion means something ?????

ur nose is rubbed raw from ur fake threads , and the title u say I have is wrong u dumb shit. Find it and u have facts so that makes u buttfucked again u Russia Russia buttfucked fool.
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Trump sent a payment to Daniels ahead of the 2016 election, allegedly to keep Daniels quiet about an affair the two of them had in 2006. Trump pleaded not guilty to all 34 charges.
Since the indictment, several legal experts have argued they believe that Bragg’s case is exceptionally weak.
The question to ask yourself in a case like this [is], ‘Would a case like this be brought against anybody else, whether he or she be president, former president or a regular citizen?’ The answer is… no,” Former Whitewater deputy counsel Sol Wisenberg said.
 

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
26,033
Tokens
Just anudda FagFinch fail -

Its just commonplace
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Former federal and New York State prosecutor Tali Farhadian Weinstein said: “Bragg is making a strategic decision to push back against Donald Trump and it might backfire. The former president is demanding that the Manhattan District Attorney’s office provide a ‘bill of particulars,’ outlining the specific reason they upgraded his charges of business record fraud from misdemeanors to felonies in the Stormy Daniels hush payment case — something that under New York law, requires the fraud to have been committed in order to cover up a second crime. Bragg has declined to provide it so far. This could actually be a problem for Bragg.”
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Famed attorney Alan Dershowitz believes that Bragg could be disbarred for his case against former President Donald Trump.
Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox, wrote: “There is something painfully anticlimactic about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s indictment of former President Trump. It concerns not Trump’s efforts to overthrow the duly elected government of the United States, but his alleged effort to cover up a possible extramarital affair with a porn star. And there’s a very real risk that this indictment will end in an even bigger anticlimax. It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him.”
Mark Stern, a writer for the liberal outlet Slate, published a story titled, “The Trump Indictment Is Not the Slam-Dunk Case Democrats Wanted.”

John Bolton — who served as a national security adviser in the Trump administration and has since come out against Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign — appeared on CNN and blasted the charges filed against his ex-boss, former President Trump, saying the indictment was “even weaker than I feared it would be.”
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
The question to ask yourself in a case like this [is], ‘Would a case like this be brought against anybody else, whether he or she be president, former president or a regular citizen?’ The answer is… no,” Former Whitewater deputy counsel Sol Wisenberg said.
Ahhhhh, FINALLY a name! It's roaringly OBVIOUS while you weren't exactly EAGER to name THIS putz; looks like he's almost as BAD at predicting as YOU are (a lawyer who appears on FAUX Noise to even INDIRECTLY defend Daughter Diddler, is, by definition, a putz with earflaps, NAZI Scum). And, this was ALSO you hiding your source, FAUX Noise. What, did you FORGET that they got BUTT fucked to the tune of 787.5 million, and are on the hook for even MORE from Smartatic and their OWN SHAREHOLDERS???? Oh, yeah, and, let us not forget that they obviously were compelled, or felt a STRONG need, to fire Fucker Carlson, lol. I'm not even sure whether you've now abandoned" FAUX now or not, you're such a flip flopping CUNT, I can't keep track.


Former Whitewater lawyer explains why a Trump arrest would be 'preposterous' :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :+cops-2+::+cops-2+::+cops-2+::highfive::highfive::dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:3dfesses::3dfesses::3dfesses::lock2::lock2::lock2:

 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Ahhhhh, FINALLY a name! It's roaringly OBVIOUS while you weren't exactly EAGER to name THIS putz; looks like he's almost as BAD at predicting as YOU are (a lawyer who appears on FAUX Noise to even INDIRECTLY defend Daughter Diddler, is, by definition, a putz with earflaps, NAZI Scum). And, this was ALSO you hiding your source, FAUX Noise. What, did you FORGET that they got BUTT fucked to the tune of 787.5 million, and are on the hook for even MORE from Smartatic and their OWN SHAREHOLDERS???? Oh, yeah, and, let us not forget that they obviously were compelled, or felt a STRONG need, to fire Fucker Carlson, lol. I'm not even sure whether you've now abandoned" FAUX now or not, you're such a flip flopping CUNT, I can't keep track.


Former Whitewater lawyer explains why a Trump arrest would be 'preposterous' :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn: :+cops-2+::+cops-2+::+cops-2+::highfive::highfive::dancefool:dancefool:dancefool:3dfesses::3dfesses::3dfesses::lock2::lock2::lock2:

Lol. Names all thru it u senile buttfucked 0-114 abandoned thread rock bottom bitch. Keep slinging ur fake news my shine bitch ???
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Former federal and New York State prosecutor Tali Farhadian Weinstein said: “Bragg is making a strategic decision to push back against Donald Trump and it might backfire. The former president is demanding that the Manhattan District Attorney’s office provide a ‘bill of particulars,’ outlining the specific reason they upgraded his charges of business record fraud from misdemeanors to felonies in the Stormy Daniels hush payment case — something that under New York law, requires the fraud to have been committed in order to cover up a second crime. Bragg has declined to provide it so far. This could actually be a problem for Bragg.”
Here you've obviously LIED again, like the Nazi CUNT that you are. She doesn't say a single, solitary word about the case being "weak," she says that Bragg's "...decision...might backfire," and that "This could actually be a problem for Bragg." How the FUCK does THAT carefully worded statement that Bragg rammed SEVENTEEN "GUILTY AS CHARGED" PLEAS OUTTA SEVENTEEN TRIES up the ass of the Dump organization, and how HE knows more about the case than SHE does, since she is a FORMER federal and state prosecutor, I will respectfully BRAGG'S opinion over hers. Try AGAIN, Birdbrain. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:lock2::lock2::lock2::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::+cops-2+::+cops-2+::+cops-2+::highfive::highfive::highfive::hung::hung::hung:
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Here you've obviously LIED again, like the Nazi CUNT that you are. She doesn't say a single, solitary word about the case being "weak," she says that Bragg's "...decision...might backfire," and that "This could actually be a problem for Bragg." How the FUCK does THAT carefully worded statement that Bragg rammed SEVENTEEN "GUILTY AS CHARGED" PLEAS OUTTA SEVENTEEN TRIES up the ass of the Dump organization, and how HE knows more about the case than SHE does, since she is a FORMER federal and state prosecutor, I will respectfully BRAGG'S opinion over hers. Try AGAIN, Birdbrain. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:lock2::lock2::lock2::popcorn::popcorn::popcorn::+cops-2+::+cops-2+::+cops-2+::highfive::highfive::highfive::hung::hung::hung:
??????????????? Stay ignorant my ???

laughable at this dumb ass who is 0-114 and abandoned fake threads
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Speaking as someone who very strongly does not want Donald Trump to get the Republican presidential nomination, I’m extraordinarily distressed by this document,” Bolton said on CNN. “I think this is even weaker than I feared it would be.”
Notorious anti-Trump GOP Sen. Mitt Romney issued a statement saying: “I believe President Trump’s character and conduct make him unfit for office. Even so, I believe the New York prosecutor has stretched to reach felony criminal charges in order to fit a political agenda. No one is above the law, not even former presidents, but everyone is entitled to equal treatment under the law. The prosecutor’s overreach sets a dangerous precedent for criminalizing political opponents and damages the public’s faith in our justice system.”
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Stated day one a nothing burger. Just like the lying bitch no one raped. Just another jizz shot that ole ??? Ervin swallows and takes up the ass

ya would think after 0-114 and thousands of fake abandoned threads he jump off a cliff. Naw, the old miserable cock rammed fools greases it up for more ??????????
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Famed attorney Alan Dershowitz believes that Bragg could be disbarred for his case against former President Donald Trump.
Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox, wrote: “There is something painfully anticlimactic about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s indictment of former President Trump. It concerns not Trump’s efforts to overthrow the duly elected government of the United States, but his alleged effort to cover up a possible extramarital affair with a porn star. And there’s a very real risk that this indictment will end in an even bigger anticlimax. It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him.”
Mark Stern, a writer for the liberal outlet Slate, published a story titled, “The Trump Indictment Is Not the Slam-Dunk Case Democrats Wanted.”

John Bolton — who served as a national security adviser in the Trump administration and has since come out against Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign — appeared on CNN and blasted the charges filed against his ex-boss, former President Trump, saying the indictment was “even weaker than I feared it would be.”
Wow, you're in RARE form re: stupidity today, even for YOU, which is saying something:

ALLAN DERSHOWITZ?????? :ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO:

Now, unlike YOU, you Nazi turd, I'm not just gonna express my disdain for somebody or something and let it go at that. There are WAY more examples of this putz making a fool of himself in trying to defend Blubber Boy, but these two will suffice for our purposes.


Dershowitz: E. Jean Carroll case should have never went to trial | The Record​


:ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO::ROFLMAO: (See what I said above about any lawyer who would appear on FAUX Noise to defend tRump is, by definition, a putz? Well, that goes TENFOLD FOR Newsmaxx. You're so fucking stupid it's incredible, but, I digress."should have never went to trial," because it was so old. That shows that this fucking hasn't "lost a step" in terms of being a lawyer, he has lost all the blocks in Manhattan: it wasn't about being OLD, because, one, NY passed a law allowing the action for one year, no matter HOW old the alleged incident is, and two (the defamation part), Blubber Boy cleverly ran his mouth AFTER he was POTUS, so she BUTT fucked on THAT instance, and can now resume the suit brought when he ran his mouth while he WAS POTUS-and, he's gonna take it up the ass AGAIN, only for a LOT more than five million, lol. Getting back to Worse-a-witless, he's got problems of his OWN, i.e., facing a BAR complaint for his help with that slut Scary Puddle, and begging like a little bitch to NOT be sanctioned along with her other lawyers, lol, so, it's a LOT more likely that HE will get disbarred than Bragg will, you fucking idiot:

https://lawandcrime.com/2022-midter...wyer-of-helping-lead-the-attack-on-democracy/

Bar Complaint Filed Against Alan Dershowitz over Kari Lake Voting Machine Lawsuit Accuses Famed Lawyer of ‘Helping Lead the Attack on Democracy’



Lawyer Begs Judge Not To Sanction Him With Rest Of Kari Lake's Legal Team​


BUTT fucked AGAIN, huh, Nazi Turd?
 

Active member
Joined
Nov 23, 2011
Messages
104,639
Tokens
Keep slinging. The 0-114, abandoned threads , the buttfuckings and ur ignorant ass speaks for itself

U swallow the jizz my ignorant fake news posting ???
 

Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2007
Messages
22,991
Tokens
Famed attorney Alan Dershowitz believes that Bragg could be disbarred for his case against former President Donald Trump.
Ian Millhiser, a senior correspondent at Vox, wrote: “There is something painfully anticlimactic about Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s indictment of former President Trump. It concerns not Trump’s efforts to overthrow the duly elected government of the United States, but his alleged effort to cover up a possible extramarital affair with a porn star. And there’s a very real risk that this indictment will end in an even bigger anticlimax. It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him.”
Mark Stern, a writer for the liberal outlet Slate, published a story titled, “The Trump Indictment Is Not the Slam-Dunk Case Democrats Wanted.”

John Bolton — who served as a national security adviser in the Trump administration and has since come out against Donald Trump’s 2024 campaign — appeared on CNN and blasted the charges filed against his ex-boss, former President Trump, saying the indictment was “even weaker than I feared it would be.”
I duuno who Ian Millhiser is, and he's certainly entitled to his opinion, but, one, an "anti-climax" is HIS opinion, and, two an anti-climax is NOT the same as weak case. Furthermore, he concludes with "It is unclear that the felony statute that Trump is accused of violating actually applies to him.” I'm sure it IS "unclear" to HIM, but, ya know who it's NOT unclear to: Harvard educated, duly elected Manhattan DA 17-outta-17 guilty charges already obtained against tRump.org, Alvin Bragg. And, sometimes, you have to point out the obvious: HE is an attorney, and Ian Millhiser is NOT. That also brings up the point hat THESE are your "legal experts," only ONE of the four people mentioned here is-for the moment-an attorney, Dersha-worst, and we've already DEALT with that hack. So, you lied FOUR TIMES in ONE post, stay ignornant, my NAZI Nut Nuzzler. :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :ROFLMAO: :arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead:arrowhead

Oh, almost forgot, John Bolton, in particular, can kiss my ENTIRE black ass. He was stupid enough to WORK for tRump, then, when subopeaned by the J6 folks, thought it was better to write a BOOK about what happened rather than testify. He's lucky he ain't in JAIL.

Back to YOU: Eat a DICK, Nazi Scum.
 

Forum statistics

Threads
1,119,245
Messages
13,565,909
Members
100,778
Latest member
divya111
The RX is the sports betting industry's leading information portal for bonuses, picks, and sportsbook reviews. Find the best deals offered by a sportsbook in your state and browse our free picks section.FacebookTwitterInstagramContact Usforum@therx.com